Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients’ Refusal of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Transport

Background Emergency Medical Services (EMS) activations declined during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The reasons patients accept or decline EMS evaluation and transport are multifactorial. This study examined changes in EMS transport refusal rates during the early COVID-19 pandemic compared with the prior year. Methodology Run reports were obtained from a single ground ambulance service (SouthStar EMS, North Augusta, South Carolina, USA). Calls during the first 90 days following the U.S. national emergency declaration for COVID-19 (March 13-June 11, 2020) were compared with the same period in 2019. A total of 1,889 calls occurred in 2019, and 1,707 calls occurred in 2020. Runs were categorized as emergent (911) or non-emergent scheduled transports. Outcomes were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Results Emergent calls increased from 1,148/1,889 (60.8%) in 2019 to 1,301/1,707 (76.2%) in 2020 (p < 0.00001). Refusal of EMS-recommended transport after evaluation increased from 66/1,148 (5.7%) in 2019 to 113/1,301 (8.7%) in 2020 (p = 0.0021). The combined proportion of patients refusing evaluation or refusing recommended transport increased from 189/1,148 (16.5%) to 249/1,301 (19.1%) (p = 0.0376). Conclusions During the early COVID-19 pandemic, refusal of EMS-recommended transport increased significantly in this EMS system. These findings suggest that pandemic-related concerns may have influenced patient decision-making regarding prehospital care. Further multi-system studies are needed to better characterize contributing factors and clinical outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.104697
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients’ Refusal of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Transport

Bradley Michael Golden, Peter V. Bui, Patrick Loeffler, Vijay Anand P. Reddy et al.
Cureus
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients’ Refusal of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Transport

Bradley Michael Golden, Peter V. Bui, Patrick Loeffler, Vijay Anand P. Reddy, John McManus, William Souter
article en

Abstract

Background Emergency Medical Services (EMS) activations declined during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The reasons patients accept or decline EMS evaluation and transport are multifactorial. This study examined changes in EMS transport refusal rates during the early COVID-19 pandemic compared with the prior year. Methodology Run reports were obtained from a single ground ambulance service (SouthStar EMS, North Augusta, South Carolina, USA). Calls during the first 90 days following the U.S. national emergency declaration for COVID-19 (March 13-June 11, 2020) were compared with the same period in 2019. A total of 1,889 calls occurred in 2019, and 1,707 calls occurred in 2020. Runs were categorized as emergent (911) or non-emergent scheduled transports. Outcomes were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Results Emergent calls increased from 1,148/1,889 (60.8%) in 2019 to 1,301/1,707 (76.2%) in 2020 (p < 0.00001). Refusal of EMS-recommended transport after evaluation increased from 66/1,148 (5.7%) in 2019 to 113/1,301 (8.7%) in 2020 (p = 0.0021). The combined proportion of patients refusing evaluation or refusing recommended transport increased from 189/1,148 (16.5%) to 249/1,301 (19.1%) (p = 0.0376). Conclusions During the early COVID-19 pandemic, refusal of EMS-recommended transport increased significantly in this EMS system. These findings suggest that pandemic-related concerns may have influenced patient decision-making regarding prehospital care. Further multi-system studies are needed to better characterize contributing factors and clinical outcomes.

Cureus
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.