Inter-epistemic and creative collaborations for water: Indigenous Peoples’ water justice across three territories

• Distributive, recognitional, procedural, and restorative dimensions of water justice are shaped by relationality. • Creative, intercultural, and inter-epistemic collaborations are mechanisms through which Indigenous water justice is enacted. • A new framework for ethical co-visioning of water futures is proposed to support relational and sustainable water governance. Indigenous Peoples’ conceptualisations of water justice challenge dominant paradigms in water governance by foregrounding relational, spiritual, and place-based understandings of water. Rather than framing water as a resource to be allocated or managed, many Indigenous communities view water as a living entity with inherent rights and a central role in sustaining interconnected life systems. This article examines how Indigenous Peoples’ conceptualisations of water justice differ from Western approaches, which often prioritise individual rights and utility. Through case studies of First Nations and Alaska Tribes in the Yukon River, the Awajún in the Chiriaco River, and the Sámi in the Deatnu River, the paper illustrates both the resilience of Indigenous Peoples’ ontologies and the tensions that arise when colonial or state-led projects and policies override Indigenous Peoples’ sovereignty and knowledge systems. Drawing on these cases, a framework for ethical co-visioning of water futures is presented, outlining principles, practices, and policy spaces that support sustainable water governance. Achieving water security requires not only recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ governance systems, legal traditions, and cosmologies, but also their full inclusion in decision-making processes to collectively overcome the ‘crisis of imagination’ hindering innovative policy responses. This article contributes to the growing recognition that water security cannot be achieved through material provision alone but must also attend to ethical, cultural, and relational dimensions of water.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Security
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2026.100197
Primary Topic
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inter-epistemic and creative collaborations for water: Indigenous Peoples’ water justice across three territories

Gordon M. Hickey, Mariella Bazán Maccera, Edda Mutter, Pamela Giselle Katic et al.
Water Security
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
article

Inter-epistemic and creative collaborations for water: Indigenous Peoples’ water justice across three territories

Gordon M. Hickey, Mariella Bazán Maccera, Edda Mutter, Pamela Giselle Katic, Henrike Neuhaus, Antonia Sohns
article en

Abstract

• Distributive, recognitional, procedural, and restorative dimensions of water justice are shaped by relationality. • Creative, intercultural, and inter-epistemic collaborations are mechanisms through which Indigenous water justice is enacted. • A new framework for ethical co-visioning of water futures is proposed to support relational and sustainable water governance. Indigenous Peoples’ conceptualisations of water justice challenge dominant paradigms in water governance by foregrounding relational, spiritual, and place-based understandings of water. Rather than framing water as a resource to be allocated or managed, many Indigenous communities view water as a living entity with inherent rights and a central role in sustaining interconnected life systems. This article examines how Indigenous Peoples’ conceptualisations of water justice differ from Western approaches, which often prioritise individual rights and utility. Through case studies of First Nations and Alaska Tribes in the Yukon River, the Awajún in the Chiriaco River, and the Sámi in the Deatnu River, the paper illustrates both the resilience of Indigenous Peoples’ ontologies and the tensions that arise when colonial or state-led projects and policies override Indigenous Peoples’ sovereignty and knowledge systems. Drawing on these cases, a framework for ethical co-visioning of water futures is presented, outlining principles, practices, and policy spaces that support sustainable water governance. Achieving water security requires not only recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ governance systems, legal traditions, and cosmologies, but also their full inclusion in decision-making processes to collectively overcome the ‘crisis of imagination’ hindering innovative policy responses. This article contributes to the growing recognition that water security cannot be achieved through material provision alone but must also attend to ethical, cultural, and relational dimensions of water.

Water SecurityVol. 27
Independent Colleges and Universities of Florida (US), EsSALUD (PE), Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan (US), Natural Resources Institute (GB), McGill University (CA), University of Greenwich (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.