Probabilistic Human Intent Prediction for Mobile Manipulation: An Evaluation with Human-Inspired Constraints

Abstract We present GUIDER (Global User Intent Dual-phase Estimation for Robots), a dual-phase probabilistic framework for intent inference in mobile manipulation that operates without predefined goals. A Synergy Map fuses motion evidence with an occupancy grid to rank likely interaction areas during navigation. After arrival, perception merges U $$^{2}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> -Net and FastSAM saliency with three geometric grasp-feasibility tests; an end-effector kinematics-aware update then evolves object probabilities in real time. In 100 teleoperation trials (20 participants $$\times $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:math> 5 tasks) in Isaac Sim, GUIDER outperformed baselines. During navigation, median stability was 100% across tasks (BOIR, the baseline, had an overall median of 89.85%), with large gains under redirection (BOIR 59.67–63.49% in T2/T5). During manipulation, median stability was 100% in all tasks, while Trajectron (manipulation baseline) dropped to 62.68% for tool grasping (T4). GUIDER yielded earlier confident object predictions in geometry-constrained settings (T5: 20.31 s remaining vs 3.89 s). Ablations confirm the need for the multi-horizon synergy map, the grasp-feasibility checks, and temporal end-effector probability evolution. GUIDER provides a unified probabilistic backbone spanning base and arm, supporting future variable-autonomy controllers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-026-02362-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Robot Manipulation and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probabilistic Human Intent Prediction for Mobile Manipulation: An Evaluation with Human-Inspired Constraints

Rustam Stolkin, Alireza Rastegarpanah, Cesar Alan Contreras, Michal Szulik et al.
1 citations
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
Robot Manipulation and Learning
25.04
article

Probabilistic Human Intent Prediction for Mobile Manipulation: An Evaluation with Human-Inspired Constraints

Rustam Stolkin, Alireza Rastegarpanah, Cesar Alan Contreras, Michal Szulik, Manolis Chiou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We present GUIDER (Global User Intent Dual-phase Estimation for Robots), a dual-phase probabilistic framework for intent inference in mobile manipulation that operates without predefined goals. A Synergy Map fuses motion evidence with an occupancy grid to rank likely interaction areas during navigation. After arrival, perception merges U $$^{2}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mmultiscripts> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mrow/> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mmultiscripts> </mml:math> -Net and FastSAM saliency with three geometric grasp-feasibility tests; an end-effector kinematics-aware update then evolves object probabilities in real time. In 100 teleoperation trials (20 participants $$\times $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:math> 5 tasks) in Isaac Sim, GUIDER outperformed baselines. During navigation, median stability was 100% across tasks (BOIR, the baseline, had an overall median of 89.85%), with large gains under redirection (BOIR 59.67–63.49% in T2/T5). During manipulation, median stability was 100% in all tasks, while Trajectron (manipulation baseline) dropped to 62.68% for tool grasping (T4). GUIDER yielded earlier confident object predictions in geometry-constrained settings (T5: 20.31 s remaining vs 3.89 s). Ablations confirm the need for the multi-horizon synergy map, the grasp-feasibility checks, and temporal end-effector probability evolution. GUIDER provides a unified probabilistic backbone spanning base and arm, supporting future variable-autonomy controllers.

Journal of Intelligent & Robotic SystemsVol. 112(2)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Aston University (GB), National Nuclear Laboratory (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Robot Manipulation and Learning
25.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.