Sabotaging the NSF fellowship is a blunder

Over the last year, the Trump administration has sent one discouraging message after another to young people aspiring to a scientific career in the United States. The corrosive rhetoric that mocks scientific expertise and the proposed-and realized-cuts to funding are driving students away from scientific careers that may no longer exist by the time they graduate. Making matters even worse, cutbacks in visas awarded to foreign students are eroding the opportunities for young American scientists to work with the most talented people in the world. There is perhaps no stronger evidence of the administration's objectives to reduce the quality of the US scientific workforce than its treatment of the National Science Foundation's flagship Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aeg7883
Primary Topic
Science, Research, and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sabotaging the NSF fellowship is a blunder

H. Holden Thorp
Science
Science, Research, and Medicine
article

Sabotaging the NSF fellowship is a blunder

H. Holden Thorp
article en

Abstract

Over the last year, the Trump administration has sent one discouraging message after another to young people aspiring to a scientific career in the United States. The corrosive rhetoric that mocks scientific expertise and the proposed-and realized-cuts to funding are driving students away from scientific careers that may no longer exist by the time they graduate. Making matters even worse, cutbacks in visas awarded to foreign students are eroding the opportunities for young American scientists to work with the most talented people in the world. There is perhaps no stronger evidence of the administration's objectives to reduce the quality of the US scientific workforce than its treatment of the National Science Foundation's flagship Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP).

ScienceVol. 391(6789)
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Science, Research, and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.