Reframing course tutoring through coaching and mentoring: implications for learner development in higher Education

This perspective paper examines coaching and mentoring practices of course tutors within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the UK. Course tutors’ roles vary across institutions under different titles, including personal tutors and academic mentors. HEIs recognise the value of these roles due to awareness of the multi-faceted pressures confronting learners. However, limited empirical research and professional practice highlight complexities in the design, development, and implementation of effective policies and strategies. Although coaching and mentoring are established as a learning and development initiative in commercial contexts, such practices in HEIs are limited. This imbalance is partly attributable to incentives associated with workplace coaching, compared to HEIs where such practices are embedded within academic workloads. Moreover, academics may see these practices as a burden, undertaken without formal training. Readiness to engage with coaching and mentoring is also uneven, among undergraduates compared to postgraduate learners. These challenges lead to a knowledge and practice gap that warrants critical reflection and collaborative inquiry involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on theoretical links between coaching and learning, alongside our practices at Nottingham Business School, we offer insights into how coaching and mentoring-informed course tutoring enhance learner development, academic practice, and institutional approaches to personalised learning within HEIs. This perspective paper examines coaching and mentoring practices of course tutors within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the UK. Course tutors’ roles vary across institutions under different titles, including personal tutors and academic mentors. HEIs recognise the value of these roles due to awareness of the multi-faceted pressures confronting learners. However, limited empirical research and professional practice highlight complexities in the design, development, and implementation of effective policies and strategies. Although coaching and mentoring are established as a learning and development initiative in commercial contexts, such practices in HEIs are limited. This imbalance is partly attributable to incentives associated with workplace coaching, compared to HEIs where such practices are embedded within academic workloads. Moreover, academics may see these practices as a burden, undertaken without formal training. Readiness to engage with coaching and mentoring is also uneven, among undergraduates compared to postgraduate learners. These challenges lead to a knowledge and practice gap that warrants critical reflection and collaborative inquiry involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on theoretical links between coaching and learning, alongside our practices at Nottingham Business School, we offer insights into how coaching and mentoring-informed course tutoring enhance learner development, academic practice, and institutional approaches to personalised learning within HEIs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Development International
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2026.2633994
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reframing course tutoring through coaching and mentoring: implications for learner development in higher Education

Duminda Rajasinghe, Tolulope Fadipe
Human Resource Development International
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
article

Reframing course tutoring through coaching and mentoring: implications for learner development in higher Education

Duminda Rajasinghe, Tolulope Fadipe
article en

Abstract

This perspective paper examines coaching and mentoring practices of course tutors within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the UK. Course tutors’ roles vary across institutions under different titles, including personal tutors and academic mentors. HEIs recognise the value of these roles due to awareness of the multi-faceted pressures confronting learners. However, limited empirical research and professional practice highlight complexities in the design, development, and implementation of effective policies and strategies. Although coaching and mentoring are established as a learning and development initiative in commercial contexts, such practices in HEIs are limited. This imbalance is partly attributable to incentives associated with workplace coaching, compared to HEIs where such practices are embedded within academic workloads. Moreover, academics may see these practices as a burden, undertaken without formal training. Readiness to engage with coaching and mentoring is also uneven, among undergraduates compared to postgraduate learners. These challenges lead to a knowledge and practice gap that warrants critical reflection and collaborative inquiry involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on theoretical links between coaching and learning, alongside our practices at Nottingham Business School, we offer insights into how coaching and mentoring-informed course tutoring enhance learner development, academic practice, and institutional approaches to personalised learning within HEIs. This perspective paper examines coaching and mentoring practices of course tutors within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the UK. Course tutors’ roles vary across institutions under different titles, including personal tutors and academic mentors. HEIs recognise the value of these roles due to awareness of the multi-faceted pressures confronting learners. However, limited empirical research and professional practice highlight complexities in the design, development, and implementation of effective policies and strategies. Although coaching and mentoring are established as a learning and development initiative in commercial contexts, such practices in HEIs are limited. This imbalance is partly attributable to incentives associated with workplace coaching, compared to HEIs where such practices are embedded within academic workloads. Moreover, academics may see these practices as a burden, undertaken without formal training. Readiness to engage with coaching and mentoring is also uneven, among undergraduates compared to postgraduate learners. These challenges lead to a knowledge and practice gap that warrants critical reflection and collaborative inquiry involving multiple stakeholders. Drawing on theoretical links between coaching and learning, alongside our practices at Nottingham Business School, we offer insights into how coaching and mentoring-informed course tutoring enhance learner development, academic practice, and institutional approaches to personalised learning within HEIs.

Human Resource Development International
Nottingham Trent University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.