Ten-Year Follow-Up: Collagenase Injection Versus Open Surgery for Dupuytren’s Disease

Background: Dupuytren’s disease (DD) is a fibroproliferative disorder of the palmar fascia that results in progressive digital flexion contractures. Various treatment strategies have been developed to restore extension, ranging from minimally invasive collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injection to more invasive surgical procedures such as open selective aponeurectomy. While CCH has gained widespread adoption due to its limited invasiveness and rapid recovery, questions remain about its long-term durability compared with open surgery (OS). This study aims to compare long-term outcomes of CCH injection and OS in patients with stage 2 or higher single-digit DD, focusing on recurrence, patient satisfaction, complications, and return to work at least 10 years after treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients treated in 2012 with either CCH injection or OS. All patients had at least stage 2 DD and at least 10 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was to compare recurrence rates between the two patient cohorts. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) satisfaction, Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) scores, complications, and time to return to work. Results: A total of 97 patients completed 10-year follow-up (60 OS, 37 CCH). Recurrence at 7 years was relatively similar between groups. However, a pronounced divergence emerged between 7 and 10 years. At 10 years, recurrence occurred in 10 patients in the OS group versus 15 in the CCH group, with statistically significant differences overall (p = 0.0175) and particularly in the PIP subgroup (p = 0.0041). VAS satisfaction at 10 years was higher after OS (7.9 ± 1.5) than after CCH (6.4 ± 1.6), and return to work was significantly faster after CCH. MHQ scores were comparable. Conclusion: Both treatments provided acceptable patient satisfaction at 10 years; however, OS yielded better long-term recurrence rates and fewer complications. Although CCH offers rapid recovery, its durability beyond 7 years appears markedly inferior. These findings reinforce the need for careful patient selection and long-term counseling when considering minimally invasive treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgeries
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries7010034
Primary Topic
Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten-Year Follow-Up: Collagenase Injection Versus Open Surgery for Dupuytren’s Disease

Marco Barbaliscia, Giuseppe Taccardo, L. Caruso, Gianfranco Merendi et al.
Surgeries
Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
article

Ten-Year Follow-Up: Collagenase Injection Versus Open Surgery for Dupuytren’s Disease

Marco Barbaliscia, Giuseppe Taccardo, L. Caruso, Gianfranco Merendi, Marco Passiatore, Adriano Cannella, Silvia Pietramala, Rocco De Vitis, Lorenzo Rocchi, Camillo Fulchignoni
article en

Abstract

Background: Dupuytren’s disease (DD) is a fibroproliferative disorder of the palmar fascia that results in progressive digital flexion contractures. Various treatment strategies have been developed to restore extension, ranging from minimally invasive collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injection to more invasive surgical procedures such as open selective aponeurectomy. While CCH has gained widespread adoption due to its limited invasiveness and rapid recovery, questions remain about its long-term durability compared with open surgery (OS). This study aims to compare long-term outcomes of CCH injection and OS in patients with stage 2 or higher single-digit DD, focusing on recurrence, patient satisfaction, complications, and return to work at least 10 years after treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients treated in 2012 with either CCH injection or OS. All patients had at least stage 2 DD and at least 10 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was to compare recurrence rates between the two patient cohorts. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) satisfaction, Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) scores, complications, and time to return to work. Results: A total of 97 patients completed 10-year follow-up (60 OS, 37 CCH). Recurrence at 7 years was relatively similar between groups. However, a pronounced divergence emerged between 7 and 10 years. At 10 years, recurrence occurred in 10 patients in the OS group versus 15 in the CCH group, with statistically significant differences overall (p = 0.0175) and particularly in the PIP subgroup (p = 0.0041). VAS satisfaction at 10 years was higher after OS (7.9 ± 1.5) than after CCH (6.4 ± 1.6), and return to work was significantly faster after CCH. MHQ scores were comparable. Conclusion: Both treatments provided acceptable patient satisfaction at 10 years; however, OS yielded better long-term recurrence rates and fewer complications. Although CCH offers rapid recovery, its durability beyond 7 years appears markedly inferior. These findings reinforce the need for careful patient selection and long-term counseling when considering minimally invasive treatment.

SurgeriesVol. 7(1)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), University of Brescia (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.