Humans can learn bimodal priors in complex sensorimotor behaviour

Bayesian integration offers a powerful unifying framework for perception, cognition and motor control. Extensive laboratory-based research shows that humans integrate sensory inputs and prior expectations in a Bayesian manner to guide action. However, it remains unclear whether this extends to naturalistic tasks involving more complex movements and environmental statistics. Here, we examine whether humans can learn bimodal priors in a complex sensorimotor task: returning tennis serves. Participants returned serves in an extended reality set-up with task demands closely matching real tennis. The opponent's serve locations followed a bimodal (i.e. two-peaked) distribution. We manipulated visual uncertainty through three ball speeds. After extensive exposure to the opponent's serves, participants' movements were systematically biased by the bimodal prior distribution. Consistent with Bayesian theory, the magnitude of the bias scaled with uncertainty. In addition to prior expectations, our data show that participants' movements were also biased by biomechanical constraints and motor costs. Intriguingly, explicit knowledge tests revealed that participants incorporated prior knowledge of the opponent's serve distribution into their behaviour without explicit awareness of the pattern. These findings demonstrate that humans can implicitly acquire and exploit bimodal priors in complex, naturalistic sensorimotor behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.2296
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Humans can learn bimodal priors in complex sensorimotor behaviour

Stephan Zahno, Damian Beck, Ernst-Joachim Hossner, Konrad Kording
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Humans can learn bimodal priors in complex sensorimotor behaviour

Stephan Zahno, Damian Beck, Ernst-Joachim Hossner, Konrad Kording
article en

Abstract

Bayesian integration offers a powerful unifying framework for perception, cognition and motor control. Extensive laboratory-based research shows that humans integrate sensory inputs and prior expectations in a Bayesian manner to guide action. However, it remains unclear whether this extends to naturalistic tasks involving more complex movements and environmental statistics. Here, we examine whether humans can learn bimodal priors in a complex sensorimotor task: returning tennis serves. Participants returned serves in an extended reality set-up with task demands closely matching real tennis. The opponent's serve locations followed a bimodal (i.e. two-peaked) distribution. We manipulated visual uncertainty through three ball speeds. After extensive exposure to the opponent's serves, participants' movements were systematically biased by the bimodal prior distribution. Consistent with Bayesian theory, the magnitude of the bias scaled with uncertainty. In addition to prior expectations, our data show that participants' movements were also biased by biomechanical constraints and motor costs. Intriguingly, explicit knowledge tests revealed that participants incorporated prior knowledge of the opponent's serve distribution into their behaviour without explicit awareness of the pattern. These findings demonstrate that humans can implicitly acquire and exploit bimodal priors in complex, naturalistic sensorimotor behaviour.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 293(2066)
English Institute of Sport (GB), California University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
University of Bern
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.