Why stablecoins fail: design fragilities, regulation, and the role of institutions

Stablecoins facilitate large volumes of on-chain payments, raising urgent questions about stability and regulation. This paper reviews recent studies on the economic design of stablecoins and the determinants of their price stability. It also introduces a cross-country dataset covering forty jurisdictions. Using hand-collected documents and an LLM-assisted evaluation, we score legislation, licensing, reserve requirements, disclosure, and currency restrictions. Then, we construct composite indicators of openness and risk containment. By linking these measures to institutional-quality data from the Quality of Government database, we discovered that stronger rule of law, protection of rights, and higher order and security are associated with more comprehensive and enforceable frameworks. This study expands the law-and-finance literature to include digital assets, providing global policy insights and lessons for sustainable financial development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2026.2633661
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why stablecoins fail: design fragilities, regulation, and the role of institutions

Xiapeng Song, Fangmin Hao
Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Why stablecoins fail: design fragilities, regulation, and the role of institutions

Xiapeng Song, Fangmin Hao
article en

Abstract

Stablecoins facilitate large volumes of on-chain payments, raising urgent questions about stability and regulation. This paper reviews recent studies on the economic design of stablecoins and the determinants of their price stability. It also introduces a cross-country dataset covering forty jurisdictions. Using hand-collected documents and an LLM-assisted evaluation, we score legislation, licensing, reserve requirements, disclosure, and currency restrictions. Then, we construct composite indicators of openness and risk containment. By linking these measures to institutional-quality data from the Quality of Government database, we discovered that stronger rule of law, protection of rights, and higher order and security are associated with more comprehensive and enforceable frameworks. This study expands the law-and-finance literature to include digital assets, providing global policy insights and lessons for sustainable financial development.

Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.