The use and impact of AI-tools in early-stage startups

Purpose While artificial intelligence (AI) is a hot topic in public debate and academic discourse, most research is still conceptual with only a few insights into how AI is used in entrepreneurship practice. This study explores empirically how and with what effect early-stage IT startups utilize AI tools, with the general aim of getting a better understanding of how a new technology is adopted in the entrepreneurial process. Design/methodology/approach Conceptually, our study builds on the External Enabler Framework to structure the analysis. Following a mixed-method approach, we first analyze qualitative data on how AI tools are used in early-stage startups and identify the mechanisms that are facilitated. In a quantitative study, we test the effect of two identified efficiency mechanisms. Specifically, using Crunchbase data, we compare startups before and after the introduction of ChatGPT-3, focusing on (1) the number of employees and (2) the time to achieve seed funding. Findings Our qualitative study indicates that startups use AI mainly in the form of GenAI tools to streamline the process of venture creation, saving time and resources, and less frequently for directly shaping the offered product or the venture itself, presumably resulting from the distinct demands of different applications. While AI is considered important, it has so far not replaced human agency. Building on these results, the quantitative study confirms that startups with access to GenAI tools require fewer employees and achieve critical milestones faster, specifically securing seed funding. Research limitations/implications Our qualitative study is based on interviews with early-stage IT startups applying AI tools. In the quantitative study, it is challenging to distinguish between AI-infused efficiency effects and investor-related supply-side effects, resulting from the hype surrounding AI. Future research is needed to explore AI's broader influence on entrepreneurial processes. Originality/value Our study is one of the first to uncover the use of AI tools in early-stage startups, allowing entrepreneurs to compare with others and enabling policymakers to identify changes in the startup process, with implications for policy design. For academics, our study contributes to the discussion around AI and agency in the entrepreneurial process and provides insights into the applicability of the External Enabler framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-10-2024-1089
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The use and impact of AI-tools in early-stage startups

Heiko Bergmann, Timothé Crelier, Jacob Mayr
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

The use and impact of AI-tools in early-stage startups

Heiko Bergmann, Timothé Crelier, Jacob Mayr
article en

Abstract

Purpose While artificial intelligence (AI) is a hot topic in public debate and academic discourse, most research is still conceptual with only a few insights into how AI is used in entrepreneurship practice. This study explores empirically how and with what effect early-stage IT startups utilize AI tools, with the general aim of getting a better understanding of how a new technology is adopted in the entrepreneurial process. Design/methodology/approach Conceptually, our study builds on the External Enabler Framework to structure the analysis. Following a mixed-method approach, we first analyze qualitative data on how AI tools are used in early-stage startups and identify the mechanisms that are facilitated. In a quantitative study, we test the effect of two identified efficiency mechanisms. Specifically, using Crunchbase data, we compare startups before and after the introduction of ChatGPT-3, focusing on (1) the number of employees and (2) the time to achieve seed funding. Findings Our qualitative study indicates that startups use AI mainly in the form of GenAI tools to streamline the process of venture creation, saving time and resources, and less frequently for directly shaping the offered product or the venture itself, presumably resulting from the distinct demands of different applications. While AI is considered important, it has so far not replaced human agency. Building on these results, the quantitative study confirms that startups with access to GenAI tools require fewer employees and achieve critical milestones faster, specifically securing seed funding. Research limitations/implications Our qualitative study is based on interviews with early-stage IT startups applying AI tools. In the quantitative study, it is challenging to distinguish between AI-infused efficiency effects and investor-related supply-side effects, resulting from the hype surrounding AI. Future research is needed to explore AI's broader influence on entrepreneurial processes. Originality/value Our study is one of the first to uncover the use of AI tools in early-stage startups, allowing entrepreneurs to compare with others and enabling policymakers to identify changes in the startup process, with implications for policy design. For academics, our study contributes to the discussion around AI and agency in the entrepreneurial process and provides insights into the applicability of the External Enabler framework.

International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research
University of St.Gallen (CH), Entrepreneurship and Small Business Research Institute (SE), University of Applied Sciences St. Gallen (CH)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.