Central Sensitization as a Marker of Cognitive and Emotional Vulnerability in Chronic Low Back Pain

<b>Background and Aim</b>: Low back pain (LBP) represents an important public health issue, with approximately 20% of acute cases progressing to chronic low back pain (CLBP). In addition to pain, patients with CLBP also suffer from reduced cognitive performance, depressive symptoms and catastrophic thoughts. Central sensitization (CS) is considered a key point in pain persistence. This study examines CS and its impact on cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning in patients with CLBP. <b>Methods</b>: In this cross-sectional study, 67 patients with CLBP were classified using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) into groups with (WCS, <i>n</i> = 32) and without central sensitization (WoCS, <i>n</i> = 35). Cognitive functioning was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), emotional functioning using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and behavioral functioning using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), including helplessness, rumination, and magnification domains. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Between-group comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, or Welch's <i>t</i>-tests. Multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for age and gender were conducted. <b>Results</b>: Compared with the WoCS group, patients with central sensitization were older (median 58 vs. 50 years, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and more frequently female (71.9% vs. 40.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.018). The WCS group showed higher PCS total scores (31.8 ± 14.2 vs. 16.0 ± 11.9), higher helplessness (14.3 ± 6.1 vs. 6.9 ± 5.5), rumination (12.7 ± 6.2 vs. 7.0 ± 4.8), and magnification scores (4.8 ± 2.4 vs. 2.1 ± 2.1), higher CES-D scores (26.3 ± 10.4 vs. 11.7 ± 7.2), and lower MoCA scores (23.6 ± 3.0 vs. 26.1 ± 2.1) (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). All associations remained significant after adjustment for age and gender. <b>Conclusions:</b> Central sensitization in CLBP is independently associated with greater pain catastrophizing across all domains, increased depressive symptoms, and reduced cognitive performance, supporting its role as a multidimensional clinical phenotype.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16030290
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Central Sensitization as a Marker of Cognitive and Emotional Vulnerability in Chronic Low Back Pain

Irene Cappadona, Davide Cardile, Rosaria De Luca, Angelo Quartarone et al.
Brain Sciences
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Central Sensitization as a Marker of Cognitive and Emotional Vulnerability in Chronic Low Back Pain

Irene Cappadona, Davide Cardile, Rosaria De Luca, Angelo Quartarone, Anna Anselmo, Giulia Martello, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, Francesco Corallo, Fabrizio Russo, Maria Pagano, Alice Laudisio
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and Aim</b>: Low back pain (LBP) represents an important public health issue, with approximately 20% of acute cases progressing to chronic low back pain (CLBP). In addition to pain, patients with CLBP also suffer from reduced cognitive performance, depressive symptoms and catastrophic thoughts. Central sensitization (CS) is considered a key point in pain persistence. This study examines CS and its impact on cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning in patients with CLBP. <b>Methods</b>: In this cross-sectional study, 67 patients with CLBP were classified using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) into groups with (WCS, <i>n</i> = 32) and without central sensitization (WoCS, <i>n</i> = 35). Cognitive functioning was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), emotional functioning using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and behavioral functioning using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), including helplessness, rumination, and magnification domains. Normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Between-group comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, or Welch's <i>t</i>-tests. Multivariable linear regression analyses adjusted for age and gender were conducted. <b>Results</b>: Compared with the WoCS group, patients with central sensitization were older (median 58 vs. 50 years, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and more frequently female (71.9% vs. 40.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.018). The WCS group showed higher PCS total scores (31.8 ± 14.2 vs. 16.0 ± 11.9), higher helplessness (14.3 ± 6.1 vs. 6.9 ± 5.5), rumination (12.7 ± 6.2 vs. 7.0 ± 4.8), and magnification scores (4.8 ± 2.4 vs. 2.1 ± 2.1), higher CES-D scores (26.3 ± 10.4 vs. 11.7 ± 7.2), and lower MoCA scores (23.6 ± 3.0 vs. 26.1 ± 2.1) (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). All associations remained significant after adjustment for age and gender. <b>Conclusions:</b> Central sensitization in CLBP is independently associated with greater pain catastrophizing across all domains, increased depressive symptoms, and reduced cognitive performance, supporting its role as a multidimensional clinical phenotype.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(3)
Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Campus Bio Medico University Hospital (IT), Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.