Body-weight supported treadmill or total body recumbent stepper for mobility-adapted cardiopulmonary exercise testing in multiple sclerosis patients with varying disability

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>max</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> was similar between devices among MS patients. On BWST, they achieved lower <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>max</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> values compared to Controls. MS patients more successfully achieved the primary criterion, VO<sub>2</sub> plateau (≤150 ml/min<sup>-1</sup>), using TBRS. Additionally, TBRS permitted persons with mobility disability to achieve more criteria for a maximum CPET. Our results suggest that CPET using BWST, being reliant on the lower body, likely disadvantages MS patients, especially those with mobility disability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2026.1731215
Primary Topic
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body-weight supported treadmill or total body recumbent stepper for mobility-adapted cardiopulmonary exercise testing in multiple sclerosis patients with varying disability

Liam Kelly, Hamidreza Barzegarpoor, Caitlin J. Newell, Lynsey R. Alcock et al.
Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
article

Body-weight supported treadmill or total body recumbent stepper for mobility-adapted cardiopulmonary exercise testing in multiple sclerosis patients with varying disability

Liam Kelly, Hamidreza Barzegarpoor, Caitlin J. Newell, Lynsey R. Alcock, Saman Hadjizadeh Anvar, Michelle Ploughman
article en

Abstract

<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>max</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> was similar between devices among MS patients. On BWST, they achieved lower <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover> </mml:mrow> <mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow> <mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>max</mml:mo></mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> values compared to Controls. MS patients more successfully achieved the primary criterion, VO<sub>2</sub> plateau (≤150 ml/min<sup>-1</sup>), using TBRS. Additionally, TBRS permitted persons with mobility disability to achieve more criteria for a maximum CPET. Our results suggest that CPET using BWST, being reliant on the lower body, likely disadvantages MS patients, especially those with mobility disability.

Frontiers in Rehabilitation SciencesVol. 7
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Canada Research Chairs
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.