From empirical formulas to machine learning: A comprehensive review of detonation velocity prediction for advanced energetic materials

• This article surveys detonation velocity prediction for ideal and non-ideal energetic materials. • It compares classical empirical formulas with modern machine learning frameworks. • It demonstrates how theoretical descriptors enable virtual screening of explosives. • It evaluates the impact of molecular architecture on predictive model accuracy. • It provides a practical decision tree for choosing the best modeling strategy. The predictive modeling of detonation velocity is a cornerstone of advanced materials design, offering a cost-effective and safe alternative to the hazardous experimental characterization of novel energetic compounds. This analysis bridges the gap between traditional empirical correlations and emerging machine learning architectures, assessing how structural descriptors and quantum-chemical parameters dictate macroscopic explosive performance. While established empirical formulas provide rapid utility for standard CHNO-based scaffolds, their reliability diminishes when applied to the complex, heterogeneous formulations required for modern aerospace and defense applications. In response, data-driven ensemble learning models have demonstrated superior capacity for the virtual screening of candidate molecules, effectively mapping molecular architecture to detonation kinetics with high fidelity. Integrating these predictive methodologies into a robust decision framework enables a more sustainable workflow for the rational design and structural optimization of high-performance energetics

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials & Design
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2026.115764
Primary Topic
Energetic Materials and Combustion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From empirical formulas to machine learning: A comprehensive review of detonation velocity prediction for advanced energetic materials

Mohammad Hossein Keshavarz
Materials & Design
Energetic Materials and Combustion
article

From empirical formulas to machine learning: A comprehensive review of detonation velocity prediction for advanced energetic materials

Mohammad Hossein Keshavarz
article en

Abstract

• This article surveys detonation velocity prediction for ideal and non-ideal energetic materials. • It compares classical empirical formulas with modern machine learning frameworks. • It demonstrates how theoretical descriptors enable virtual screening of explosives. • It evaluates the impact of molecular architecture on predictive model accuracy. • It provides a practical decision tree for choosing the best modeling strategy. The predictive modeling of detonation velocity is a cornerstone of advanced materials design, offering a cost-effective and safe alternative to the hazardous experimental characterization of novel energetic compounds. This analysis bridges the gap between traditional empirical correlations and emerging machine learning architectures, assessing how structural descriptors and quantum-chemical parameters dictate macroscopic explosive performance. While established empirical formulas provide rapid utility for standard CHNO-based scaffolds, their reliability diminishes when applied to the complex, heterogeneous formulations required for modern aerospace and defense applications. In response, data-driven ensemble learning models have demonstrated superior capacity for the virtual screening of candidate molecules, effectively mapping molecular architecture to detonation kinetics with high fidelity. Integrating these predictive methodologies into a robust decision framework enables a more sustainable workflow for the rational design and structural optimization of high-performance energetics

Materials & DesignVol. 265
University of Applied Science and Technology (IR), Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Energetic Materials and Combustion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.