Evolving Digital Preservation Appraisal Criteria and Selection

Abstract This paper expands the 2018 article “Approaching Appraisal: Framing Criteria for Selecting Digital Content for Preservation” with an examination, review, and discussion. Specifically, the paper will examine the development of additional criteria and refine the original Work and Tallman criteria through implementation, practice, and the challenges encountered over the past seven years in the United States. It reflects on two examples of how the criteria have been implemented within academic institutions, highlighting the challenges and hurdles encountered in the process. The external conditions influencing how practitioners do their work have been incredibly challenging over the past seven years, from the pandemic to the proliferation of artificial intelligence technologies, stakeholders’ demand for more inclusive and representative archival work, to the effects of climate change and its intersection with social justice in the communities our institutions serve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Preservation Digital Technology & Culture
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2025-0057
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolving Digital Preservation Appraisal Criteria and Selection

Virginia Dressler, Chelsea Denault, Nathan Tallman, Martha Anderson
Preservation Digital Technology & Culture
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

Evolving Digital Preservation Appraisal Criteria and Selection

Virginia Dressler, Chelsea Denault, Nathan Tallman, Martha Anderson
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper expands the 2018 article “Approaching Appraisal: Framing Criteria for Selecting Digital Content for Preservation” with an examination, review, and discussion. Specifically, the paper will examine the development of additional criteria and refine the original Work and Tallman criteria through implementation, practice, and the challenges encountered over the past seven years in the United States. It reflects on two examples of how the criteria have been implemented within academic institutions, highlighting the challenges and hurdles encountered in the process. The external conditions influencing how practitioners do their work have been incredibly challenging over the past seven years, from the pandemic to the proliferation of artificial intelligence technologies, stakeholders’ demand for more inclusive and representative archival work, to the effects of climate change and its intersection with social justice in the communities our institutions serve.

Preservation Digital Technology & Culture
Kent State University (US), Heritage Preservation (US), Preservation Virginia (US), Yale University (US), University of Virginia (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.