Effect of liner geometry on jumping distance: as relevant as head size

Dislocation is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previously, we found that different liner models provided varying degrees of articulating head coverage. Jumping distance (JD) is a key indicator of joint stability. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the differences in JD values among various liner models. JD values were determined using previously published articulating head coverage data for 25 modular polyethylene liners used in 6 uncemented cup designs from 4 major manufacturers using a mathematical model. For each liner, the average values corresponding to each femoral head size within each cup size were used in the analysis. Within the safe zone (5–25° anteversion and 30–50° inclination), average JD values ranged from 10.79 to 17.29 mm, depending on cup positioning, liner design, and femoral head size. On average, enlarging the femoral head size from 28 to 36 mm resulted in a 3.53 mm increase in JD within the safe zone. The JD variation between different liner designs was of the same magnitude as the effect of increasing the femoral head size from 28 to 36 mm: 3.16 mm with 32 mm and 3.32 mm with 36 mm femoral heads. The JD of the liner with the lowest coverage combined with a 36 mm femoral head was lower than that of the liner providing the greatest coverage, even when coupled with a 28 mm femoral head. Liner design can influence JD to a degree comparable to increasing femoral head size from 28 to 36 mm. Among the evaluated designs, liners providing greater coverage, such as the X3, yielded higher JD values for the same femoral head size. As optimal joint stability cannot be ensured solely by selecting a larger head size, liner geometry should be carefully considered alongside head size in THA component selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-09688-y
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of liner geometry on jumping distance: as relevant as head size

Perttu Neuvonen, Jari Hyttinen, J. Ochoa, Jari Viik et al.
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Effect of liner geometry on jumping distance: as relevant as head size

Perttu Neuvonen, Jari Hyttinen, J. Ochoa, Jari Viik, Mikko Pulkkanen, Antti Eskelinen, Aleksi Reito
article en

Abstract

Dislocation is a common complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Previously, we found that different liner models provided varying degrees of articulating head coverage. Jumping distance (JD) is a key indicator of joint stability. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the differences in JD values among various liner models. JD values were determined using previously published articulating head coverage data for 25 modular polyethylene liners used in 6 uncemented cup designs from 4 major manufacturers using a mathematical model. For each liner, the average values corresponding to each femoral head size within each cup size were used in the analysis. Within the safe zone (5–25° anteversion and 30–50° inclination), average JD values ranged from 10.79 to 17.29 mm, depending on cup positioning, liner design, and femoral head size. On average, enlarging the femoral head size from 28 to 36 mm resulted in a 3.53 mm increase in JD within the safe zone. The JD variation between different liner designs was of the same magnitude as the effect of increasing the femoral head size from 28 to 36 mm: 3.16 mm with 32 mm and 3.32 mm with 36 mm femoral heads. The JD of the liner with the lowest coverage combined with a 36 mm femoral head was lower than that of the liner providing the greatest coverage, even when coupled with a 28 mm femoral head. Liner design can influence JD to a degree comparable to increasing femoral head size from 28 to 36 mm. Among the evaluated designs, liners providing greater coverage, such as the X3, yielded higher JD values for the same femoral head size. As optimal joint stability cannot be ensured solely by selecting a larger head size, liner geometry should be carefully considered alongside head size in THA component selection.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Tampere University of Applied Sciences (FI), Tampere University (FI), Coxa Hospital (FI), Tampere University (FI), Urho Kaleva Kekkonen Institute (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.