A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus: global research trends from scopus database (1988–2024)

Diabetes mellitus, a global epidemic, necessitates robust evidence synthesis to guide clinical practice. This study analyzes systematic reviews and meta-analyses in diabetes research to identify trends, gaps, and key insights for advancing diabetes management. We analyzed 10,714 systematic reviews and meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus, published between 1988 and 2024, sourced from Scopus. Publication trends, collaboration networks, and research clusters were examined using VOSviewer and Scimago Graphica. Research output surged post-2011, with China leading overall (3,241 publications, 30.25%), followed by the United States (1,915, 17.87%) and the United Kingdom (1,560, 14.56%). Twelve clinical clusters emerged, including therapeutics (e.g., metformin, dual-agonist therapies), cardiovascular outcomes, lifestyle factors, mental health, maternal health, and bone health. High-impact studies underscored vascular complications, mental health links, and gestational diabetes risks, shaping practice. Recent trends emphasize dual-agonist therapies like Tirzepatide, digital health, and weight management, while gastric bypass surgery, bone mineral density, and maternal health reflect enduring influence. Research shifted from early methodological approaches to later comorbidity-driven studies, yet low- and middle-income country (LMIC) contributions remain limited. This study illuminates a dynamic evidence base for diabetes mellitus, spanning decades of impactful clinical research and emerging innovations. However, disparities in LMIC representation and insufficient long-term evaluations of novel therapies limit its global applicability. Future research must prioritize LMIC populations and sustained efficacy studies to strengthen diabetes management strategies worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiovascular Diabetology – Endocrinology Reports
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-026-00272-w
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus: global research trends from scopus database (1988–2024)

Hojat Dehghanbanadaki, Ali Faryabi, Alaleh Dalvand, Hossein Aazami et al.
Cardiovascular Diabetology – Endocrinology Reports
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus: global research trends from scopus database (1988–2024)

Hojat Dehghanbanadaki, Ali Faryabi, Alaleh Dalvand, Hossein Aazami, Hassan Akbarniakhaky, Ghazal Mohammadi, Sajad Parvar, Reza Habibi
article en

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus, a global epidemic, necessitates robust evidence synthesis to guide clinical practice. This study analyzes systematic reviews and meta-analyses in diabetes research to identify trends, gaps, and key insights for advancing diabetes management. We analyzed 10,714 systematic reviews and meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus, published between 1988 and 2024, sourced from Scopus. Publication trends, collaboration networks, and research clusters were examined using VOSviewer and Scimago Graphica. Research output surged post-2011, with China leading overall (3,241 publications, 30.25%), followed by the United States (1,915, 17.87%) and the United Kingdom (1,560, 14.56%). Twelve clinical clusters emerged, including therapeutics (e.g., metformin, dual-agonist therapies), cardiovascular outcomes, lifestyle factors, mental health, maternal health, and bone health. High-impact studies underscored vascular complications, mental health links, and gestational diabetes risks, shaping practice. Recent trends emphasize dual-agonist therapies like Tirzepatide, digital health, and weight management, while gastric bypass surgery, bone mineral density, and maternal health reflect enduring influence. Research shifted from early methodological approaches to later comorbidity-driven studies, yet low- and middle-income country (LMIC) contributions remain limited. This study illuminates a dynamic evidence base for diabetes mellitus, spanning decades of impactful clinical research and emerging innovations. However, disparities in LMIC representation and insufficient long-term evaluations of novel therapies limit its global applicability. Future research must prioritize LMIC populations and sustained efficacy studies to strengthen diabetes management strategies worldwide.

Cardiovascular Diabetology – Endocrinology ReportsVol. 12(1)
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.