Empirical evidence of direct and indirect relations between environmental pressure and conflict

At a time of increased negative effects of environmental change on human systems such as extreme meteorological events, resource scarcity, and refugee crises, it is especially pressing to understand what role environmental pressure plays in increasing the likelihood of violent conflict. We use a comprehensive measure of environmental pressure – Population Biodensity, defined as the ratio of a country’s population to its biocapacity – to study the presence and intensity of conflict in a large dataset including 28 years of of observations for 181 countries, while controlling for the mediating effects of political regime and income. By means of Bayesian structural equation modelling, we found evidence of a significant relation between environmental pressure and both conflict presence and intensity. Moreover, environmental pressure was shown to be the most significant variable influencing the number of casualties in intrastate conflicts when compared to the level of democratisation and national income. These results highlight the importance of the natural environment for social sustainability, peace, and prosperity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Security and Development
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2026.2625718
Primary Topic
Transboundary Water Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical evidence of direct and indirect relations between environmental pressure and conflict

Davide Natalini, Giangiacomo Bravo, Elizaveta Kopacheva
Conflict Security and Development
Transboundary Water Resource Management
article

Empirical evidence of direct and indirect relations between environmental pressure and conflict

Davide Natalini, Giangiacomo Bravo, Elizaveta Kopacheva
article en

Abstract

At a time of increased negative effects of environmental change on human systems such as extreme meteorological events, resource scarcity, and refugee crises, it is especially pressing to understand what role environmental pressure plays in increasing the likelihood of violent conflict. We use a comprehensive measure of environmental pressure – Population Biodensity, defined as the ratio of a country’s population to its biocapacity – to study the presence and intensity of conflict in a large dataset including 28 years of of observations for 181 countries, while controlling for the mediating effects of political regime and income. By means of Bayesian structural equation modelling, we found evidence of a significant relation between environmental pressure and both conflict presence and intensity. Moreover, environmental pressure was shown to be the most significant variable influencing the number of casualties in intrastate conflicts when compared to the level of democratisation and national income. These results highlight the importance of the natural environment for social sustainability, peace, and prosperity.

Conflict Security and DevelopmentVol. 26(1)
Linnaeus University (SE), Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Transboundary Water Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.