Diagnostic Yield of [ <sup>18</sup> F]FDG PET/CT in FUO: An Italian Multicenter Study of 929 Patients

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) presents a significant diagnostic challenge because of its wide range of potential causes. The role of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in this complex clinical scenario is not yet fully understood. This multicenter retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value and clinical impact of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in patients with FUO and to identify specific factors linked to a positive [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT scan. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively included 929 patients from 12 centers who underwent [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT for FUO. The final diagnosis for each patient was established on the basis of laboratory, imaging, histopathologic or pathologic examinations, and at least 6 mo of clinical follow-up data. Final diagnoses were classified into 4 categories: infectious diseases, noninfectious inflammatory diseases, malignancies, and unknown causes (no diagnosis). Moreover, the impact of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT on clinical management, as well as its association with clinical, epidemiologic, and biochemical parameters were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The final diagnoses included infectious diseases in 332 patients (36%), noninfectious inflammatory diseases in 281 (30%), and malignancies in 103 (11%). The cause of FUO remained undiagnosed in 213 patients (23%). [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT scans had positive results for 549 (59%) patients and negative for the remaining 380 patients. The overall [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT sensitivity was 72% (95% CI, 69%-75%), specificity was 85% (95% CI, 79%-89%), positive predictive value was 94% (95% CI, 92%-96%), negative predictive value was 47% (95% CI, 44%-51%), and accuracy was 75% (95% CI, 72%-78%). Predictive markers for a positive PET/CT scan were high C-reactive protein, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, the presence of fever at the time of PET, and short duration of prior antibiotic therapy. Moreover, [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT findings directly influenced the clinical management of approximately 75% of patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT is a high-yield diagnostic tool that directly influenced clinical management of approximately 75% of patients with FUO, with optimal performance in patients with elevated inflammatory markers, fever at the time of imaging, and limited prior antibiotic use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.271525
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Yield of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in FUO: An Italian Multicenter Study of 929 Patients

Giulia Giacoppo, Flavia Linguanti, S. Peano, Elisabetta Abenavoli et al.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Diagnostic Yield of [ 18 F]FDG PET/CT in FUO: An Italian Multicenter Study of 929 Patients

Giulia Giacoppo, Flavia Linguanti, S. Peano, Elisabetta Abenavoli, R Piva, Alberto Miceli, Annalisa Franchini, Alfredo Muni, Rexhep Durmo, Michela Massollo, Angelina Filice, Claudia Battisti, Alessandro Coccarelli, Giulia Santo, Elena Busnardo, Silvia Morbelli, Cristina Ferrari, Michele Balma, Francesco Lanfranchi, Matteo Bauckneht, Virginia Liberini, Domenico Albano, Selene Capitanio, Desiree Deandreis, Riccardo Laudicella, Arturo Chiti, Francesco Bertagna
article en

Abstract

Fever of unknown origin (FUO) presents a significant diagnostic challenge because of its wide range of potential causes. The role of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in this complex clinical scenario is not yet fully understood. This multicenter retrospective observational study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value and clinical impact of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in patients with FUO and to identify specific factors linked to a positive [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT scan. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively included 929 patients from 12 centers who underwent [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT for FUO. The final diagnosis for each patient was established on the basis of laboratory, imaging, histopathologic or pathologic examinations, and at least 6 mo of clinical follow-up data. Final diagnoses were classified into 4 categories: infectious diseases, noninfectious inflammatory diseases, malignancies, and unknown causes (no diagnosis). Moreover, the impact of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT on clinical management, as well as its association with clinical, epidemiologic, and biochemical parameters were analyzed. <b>Results:</b> The final diagnoses included infectious diseases in 332 patients (36%), noninfectious inflammatory diseases in 281 (30%), and malignancies in 103 (11%). The cause of FUO remained undiagnosed in 213 patients (23%). [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT scans had positive results for 549 (59%) patients and negative for the remaining 380 patients. The overall [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT sensitivity was 72% (95% CI, 69%-75%), specificity was 85% (95% CI, 79%-89%), positive predictive value was 94% (95% CI, 92%-96%), negative predictive value was 47% (95% CI, 44%-51%), and accuracy was 75% (95% CI, 72%-78%). Predictive markers for a positive PET/CT scan were high C-reactive protein, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, the presence of fever at the time of PET, and short duration of prior antibiotic therapy. Moreover, [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT findings directly influenced the clinical management of approximately 75% of patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT is a high-yield diagnostic tool that directly influenced clinical management of approximately 75% of patients with FUO, with optimal performance in patients with elevated inflammatory markers, fever at the time of imaging, and limited prior antibiotic use.

Journal of Nuclear Medicine
University of Messina (IT), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Institut Gustave Roussy (FR), Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera (IT), Brescia University (US), Magna Graecia University (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo (IT), Ospedale San Donato (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), University of Brescia (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.