Barriers and facilitators during the implementation process of shared decision-making in the comorbidity field: staff perspectives

To enhance user participation in the complex setting of coordinating support, more knowledge is needed about strategies designed to improve user involvement. This study aimed to explore staff perceptions of barriers and facilitators during the implementation process of the innovation shared decision-making (SDM) in coordinated individual planning (CIP) within the comorbidity field of practice. A mixed methods approach was used, involving the collection and analysis of questionnaire data at two time points, followed by individual and focus group interviews. Data were collected from staff working in social services and healthcare. The data collection and analysis were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), focusing on the domains of innovation, inner setting, and individuals involved. Barriers to implementation included among others, perceptions of high workloads, a lack of relational connections between staff from different units, and staff ambiguity regarding user participation. Facilitators included circumstances such as experience with the innovation, a focus on user participation, and the presence of functional collaboration between staff from different organizations prior to implementation. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of relational connections both between users and staff and among staff from different units during the implementation process of SDM in a collaborative setting like CIP. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Social Work Research
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857x.2026.2635361
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers and facilitators during the implementation process of shared decision-making in the comorbidity field: staff perspectives

Ulla-Karin Schon, Maria Fjellfeldt, Amanda Jones
Nordic Social Work Research
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Barriers and facilitators during the implementation process of shared decision-making in the comorbidity field: staff perspectives

Ulla-Karin Schon, Maria Fjellfeldt, Amanda Jones
article en

Abstract

To enhance user participation in the complex setting of coordinating support, more knowledge is needed about strategies designed to improve user involvement. This study aimed to explore staff perceptions of barriers and facilitators during the implementation process of the innovation shared decision-making (SDM) in coordinated individual planning (CIP) within the comorbidity field of practice. A mixed methods approach was used, involving the collection and analysis of questionnaire data at two time points, followed by individual and focus group interviews. Data were collected from staff working in social services and healthcare. The data collection and analysis were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), focusing on the domains of innovation, inner setting, and individuals involved. Barriers to implementation included among others, perceptions of high workloads, a lack of relational connections between staff from different units, and staff ambiguity regarding user participation. Facilitators included circumstances such as experience with the innovation, a focus on user participation, and the presence of functional collaboration between staff from different organizations prior to implementation. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of relational connections both between users and staff and among staff from different units during the implementation process of SDM in a collaborative setting like CIP. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Nordic Social Work Research
Dalarna University (SE), Stockholm University (SE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.