Non-standard innovation: an attempt to (re)think innovation

In the face of ecological degradation, ethical concerns, and the growing instrumentalization of innovation by capitalist and managerial logics, this article proposes a radical rethinking of innovation. Drawing on Laruelle’s “non-philosophy,” later termed “non-standard philosophy,” it advances a shift from conventional techno-economic approaches toward what I define as non-standard innovation. Moving beyond Schumpeterian creative destruction, this perspective challenges not only dominant models of innovation but also the ontological foundations that render innovation an unquestioned horizon of progress. Rather than assuming innovation to be inherently beneficial or self-legitimating, the article treats innovation as material to be suspended, interrogated, and reconfigured through philosophical intervention. Building on, yet critically extending, existing alternative paradigms, such as commons-based peer production, user innovation, post-growth innovation, and cosmolocal frameworks, this approach does not merely pluralize innovation models but questions the conditions under which innovation itself becomes authoritative. By mobilizing non-standard philosophy not simply to critique innovation, but to suspend its claim to sufficiency and to articulate new rules for engaging with it, the article develops three foundational objectives for non-standard innovation: (1) an orientation toward individuals and the common good rather than organizational survival alone; (2) a transcendental–immanent method that remains grounded in the real while interrogating the conditions of innovation’s legitimacy; and (3) a quasi-scientific, explicitly transdisciplinary framework capable of remaining contestable, practical, and ethically accountable. Non-standard innovation thus emerges not as a negation of innovation, but as a constructive act of resistance and re-creation. It offers a new conceptual vocabulary and methodological posture for reorienting innovation toward responsible, convivial, and genuinely transformative practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Science Practice and Policy
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2026.2637303
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-standard innovation: an attempt to (re)think innovation

Xavier Pavie
Sustainability Science Practice and Policy
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
article

Non-standard innovation: an attempt to (re)think innovation

Xavier Pavie
article en

Abstract

In the face of ecological degradation, ethical concerns, and the growing instrumentalization of innovation by capitalist and managerial logics, this article proposes a radical rethinking of innovation. Drawing on Laruelle’s “non-philosophy,” later termed “non-standard philosophy,” it advances a shift from conventional techno-economic approaches toward what I define as non-standard innovation. Moving beyond Schumpeterian creative destruction, this perspective challenges not only dominant models of innovation but also the ontological foundations that render innovation an unquestioned horizon of progress. Rather than assuming innovation to be inherently beneficial or self-legitimating, the article treats innovation as material to be suspended, interrogated, and reconfigured through philosophical intervention. Building on, yet critically extending, existing alternative paradigms, such as commons-based peer production, user innovation, post-growth innovation, and cosmolocal frameworks, this approach does not merely pluralize innovation models but questions the conditions under which innovation itself becomes authoritative. By mobilizing non-standard philosophy not simply to critique innovation, but to suspend its claim to sufficiency and to articulate new rules for engaging with it, the article develops three foundational objectives for non-standard innovation: (1) an orientation toward individuals and the common good rather than organizational survival alone; (2) a transcendental–immanent method that remains grounded in the real while interrogating the conditions of innovation’s legitimacy; and (3) a quasi-scientific, explicitly transdisciplinary framework capable of remaining contestable, practical, and ethically accountable. Non-standard innovation thus emerges not as a negation of innovation, but as a constructive act of resistance and re-creation. It offers a new conceptual vocabulary and methodological posture for reorienting innovation toward responsible, convivial, and genuinely transformative practices.

Sustainability Science Practice and PolicyVol. 22(1)
École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (FR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.