Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and satisfaction in management education research: An explanatory-predictive hybrid SEM-RF approach

The accelerated diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in management education research presents both strategic opportunities and ethical challenges for business schools and higher education institutions. Even as AI applications promise enhanced analytical efficiency and research productivity, concerns regarding academic integrity, critical thinking development, and data confidentiality complicate their integration. Despite these tensions, empirical evidence explaining and predicting satisfaction with AI tools among management education researchers remains limited. Existing studies have focused largely on conceptual frameworks, ethical implications, often relying on student samples or cross-sectional studies. Consequently, little is known about the specific determinants of AI satisfaction among researchers. To address this gap, the present study investigates the determinants of user satisfaction with AI technologies within a management education context and develops a predictive framework to inform institutional decision-making. The study, based on a sample of 260 respondents, examined 9 key constructs. The Random Forest (RF) model was trained by running the bagging procedure on a dataset, and its performance was validated using out-of-bag error estimation to assess predictive accuracy. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) findings reveal that perceived ease of use significantly enhances perceived usefulness, which in turn drives satisfaction with AI tools. Ethical concern attitudes are negatively associated with perceived usefulness, underscoring the managerial and pedagogical trade-offs inherent in AI adoption within business schools. The RF model complements the explanatory analysis by demonstrating strong predictive performance (R² = 0.73) and identifying perceived ease of use, access to AI technologies, and perceived usefulness as the most influential predictors of satisfaction. The convergence of theory-driven and machine learning results enhances the robustness and practical relevance of the findings. By integrating explanatory and predictive modelling, this study contributes to management education literature on digital transformation and responsible innovation. The findings offer actionable insights for business school leaders, curriculum designers, and policymakers seeking to support ethically-grounded, strategically-aligned AI integration in management research and education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Business Research
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbr.2026.100102
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and satisfaction in management education research: An explanatory-predictive hybrid SEM-RF approach

Brighton Nyagadza, Gideon Mazuruse, Ashley Muvuti, Last Matsiwira et al.
Strategic Business Research
AI in Service Interactions
article

Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption and satisfaction in management education research: An explanatory-predictive hybrid SEM-RF approach

Brighton Nyagadza, Gideon Mazuruse, Ashley Muvuti, Last Matsiwira, Retius Chifurira
article en

Abstract

The accelerated diffusion of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in management education research presents both strategic opportunities and ethical challenges for business schools and higher education institutions. Even as AI applications promise enhanced analytical efficiency and research productivity, concerns regarding academic integrity, critical thinking development, and data confidentiality complicate their integration. Despite these tensions, empirical evidence explaining and predicting satisfaction with AI tools among management education researchers remains limited. Existing studies have focused largely on conceptual frameworks, ethical implications, often relying on student samples or cross-sectional studies. Consequently, little is known about the specific determinants of AI satisfaction among researchers. To address this gap, the present study investigates the determinants of user satisfaction with AI technologies within a management education context and develops a predictive framework to inform institutional decision-making. The study, based on a sample of 260 respondents, examined 9 key constructs. The Random Forest (RF) model was trained by running the bagging procedure on a dataset, and its performance was validated using out-of-bag error estimation to assess predictive accuracy. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) findings reveal that perceived ease of use significantly enhances perceived usefulness, which in turn drives satisfaction with AI tools. Ethical concern attitudes are negatively associated with perceived usefulness, underscoring the managerial and pedagogical trade-offs inherent in AI adoption within business schools. The RF model complements the explanatory analysis by demonstrating strong predictive performance (R² = 0.73) and identifying perceived ease of use, access to AI technologies, and perceived usefulness as the most influential predictors of satisfaction. The convergence of theory-driven and machine learning results enhances the robustness and practical relevance of the findings. By integrating explanatory and predictive modelling, this study contributes to management education literature on digital transformation and responsible innovation. The findings offer actionable insights for business school leaders, curriculum designers, and policymakers seeking to support ethically-grounded, strategically-aligned AI integration in management research and education.

Strategic Business ResearchVol. 2(1)
York St John University (GB), University of Zimbabwe (ZW), Korea University (KR), Korea University (JP), University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.