Abstract PR008: Preclinical activity of an orally bioavailable PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader versus inhibitors in mutant KRAS models

Abstract KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer and a major driver of multiple malignancies. Currently, no approved therapies exist for patients with KRAS-mutated tumors beyond the KRAS G12C inhibitors, and the most clinically advanced agents target HRAS and NRAS in addition to KRAS. PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) pan-KRAS degraders may offer advantages over traditional small-molecule inhibitors, including selectively targeting KRAS, which may allow for an improved therapeutic window while maintaining efficacy. Furthermore, PROTAC pan-KRAS degraders have iterative activity that may overcome the compensatory KRAS upregulation often observed after inhibitor treatment. We identified a potent and selective PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader that selectively targets KRAS while sparing HRAS and NRAS. This PROTAC forms a potent trimer complex with KRAS (both active and inactive forms) and an E3 ubiquitin ligase, which induces the ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of KRAS. In mutant KRAS (mKRAS) cell lines, our PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader induced potent and selective degradation across a broad set of KRAS alterations, including G12C/D/V/S/R, G13D, Q61H, and wild-type (WT) amplified. The PROTAC induced similar maximal degradation in a non-amplified WT model and a KRAS WT-amplified model expressing ∼30-fold more KRAS protein (95% vs 90%), highlighting the benefit of iterative activity. Degradation of KRAS led to potent inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, apoptosis induction, and antiproliferative effects in spheroid models. Oral administration in xenograft models of pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer (CRC) models harboring mKRAS G12C/D/V or G13D resulted in robust tumor regressions, accompanied by KRAS degradation and MAPK pathway suppression. Additionally, in the CT26 syngeneic model (CRC) the PROTAC displayed substantial mKRAS degradation, MAPK pathway inhibition, and single-agent activity. Compared with a clinical pan-KRAS inhibitor or pan-RAS(ON) inhibitor, the PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader induced superior apoptosis induction and antiproliferative effects in WT-amplified and KRAS G13D spheroid models and had comparable activity in additional mKRAS models. Consistent with this result, the PROTAC induced greater tumor growth inhibition than the pan-RAS(ON) inhibitor (98% vs 82%) in a KRAS G13D xenograft model of CRC. Additionally, PROTAC-mediated degradation demonstrated differentiated protein modulation compared with inhibition as measured by proteomic analysis of 3 mKRAS spheroid models. Furthermore, in the CT26 syngeneic model, PROTAC treatment resulted in a higher rate of complete responses and prolonged survival compared with a clinical pan-RAS ON inhibitor and displayed strong synergy with immune checkpoint blockade, resulting in antitumor immunological memory. Together, these findings suggest that PROTAC KRAS-selective degraders have efficacy against tumors harboring multiple KRAS mutations and display differentiated activity compared with clinical pan-RAS(ON) or pan-KRAS inhibitors. Citation Format: Andrea Lopez-Arroyo, Jason M. Berk, Dana M. Klug, John P. Caldwell, Peter Hegan, Samantha Andella, Jessica Kraus, Amanda Chapman, Jennifer Pizzano, Mark Bookbinder, Debbie Gordon, Kim Davenport, Gregory Cadelina, Madeline A. Dorso, Emma Rousseau, Christopher Kuhlberg, Morena Scopel, Rebecca Conrad, William L. Corwin, Goutham Pattabiraman, Wendy Wu, Raushan Wilson, Christine Jones, John Corradi, Keith R. Hornberger, Angela M. Cacace, Ignacio J. Juncadella, Kathryn D. Smith. Preclinical activity of an orally bioavailable PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader versus inhibitors in mutant KRAS models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1):Abstract nr PR008.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.rasoncother26-pr008
Primary Topic
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PR008: Preclinical activity of an orally bioavailable PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader versus inhibitors in mutant KRAS models

Amanda Chapman, Christopher Kuhlberg, M. Dorso, John Corradi et al.
Cancer Research
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
article

Abstract PR008: Preclinical activity of an orally bioavailable PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader versus inhibitors in mutant KRAS models

Amanda Chapman, Christopher Kuhlberg, M. Dorso, John Corradi, Andrea Lopez-Arroyo, Dana M. Klug, Gregory Cadelina, Keith R. Hornberger, Debbie Gordon, Goutham Pattabiraman, Mark Bookbinder, Jennifer Pizzano, Emma Rousseau, Rebecca Conrad, Peter S. Hegan, Ignacio J. Juncadella, Angela Cacace, J. Kraus, William L. Corwin, M Scopel, Samantha Andella, Kim Davenport, W. Wu, Jason M. Berk, Raushan Wilson, Kathryn D. Smith, John P. Caldwell, Christine Jones
article en

Abstract

Abstract KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer and a major driver of multiple malignancies. Currently, no approved therapies exist for patients with KRAS-mutated tumors beyond the KRAS G12C inhibitors, and the most clinically advanced agents target HRAS and NRAS in addition to KRAS. PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) pan-KRAS degraders may offer advantages over traditional small-molecule inhibitors, including selectively targeting KRAS, which may allow for an improved therapeutic window while maintaining efficacy. Furthermore, PROTAC pan-KRAS degraders have iterative activity that may overcome the compensatory KRAS upregulation often observed after inhibitor treatment. We identified a potent and selective PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader that selectively targets KRAS while sparing HRAS and NRAS. This PROTAC forms a potent trimer complex with KRAS (both active and inactive forms) and an E3 ubiquitin ligase, which induces the ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of KRAS. In mutant KRAS (mKRAS) cell lines, our PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader induced potent and selective degradation across a broad set of KRAS alterations, including G12C/D/V/S/R, G13D, Q61H, and wild-type (WT) amplified. The PROTAC induced similar maximal degradation in a non-amplified WT model and a KRAS WT-amplified model expressing ∼30-fold more KRAS protein (95% vs 90%), highlighting the benefit of iterative activity. Degradation of KRAS led to potent inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, apoptosis induction, and antiproliferative effects in spheroid models. Oral administration in xenograft models of pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer (CRC) models harboring mKRAS G12C/D/V or G13D resulted in robust tumor regressions, accompanied by KRAS degradation and MAPK pathway suppression. Additionally, in the CT26 syngeneic model (CRC) the PROTAC displayed substantial mKRAS degradation, MAPK pathway inhibition, and single-agent activity. Compared with a clinical pan-KRAS inhibitor or pan-RAS(ON) inhibitor, the PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader induced superior apoptosis induction and antiproliferative effects in WT-amplified and KRAS G13D spheroid models and had comparable activity in additional mKRAS models. Consistent with this result, the PROTAC induced greater tumor growth inhibition than the pan-RAS(ON) inhibitor (98% vs 82%) in a KRAS G13D xenograft model of CRC. Additionally, PROTAC-mediated degradation demonstrated differentiated protein modulation compared with inhibition as measured by proteomic analysis of 3 mKRAS spheroid models. Furthermore, in the CT26 syngeneic model, PROTAC treatment resulted in a higher rate of complete responses and prolonged survival compared with a clinical pan-RAS ON inhibitor and displayed strong synergy with immune checkpoint blockade, resulting in antitumor immunological memory. Together, these findings suggest that PROTAC KRAS-selective degraders have efficacy against tumors harboring multiple KRAS mutations and display differentiated activity compared with clinical pan-RAS(ON) or pan-KRAS inhibitors. Citation Format: Andrea Lopez-Arroyo, Jason M. Berk, Dana M. Klug, John P. Caldwell, Peter Hegan, Samantha Andella, Jessica Kraus, Amanda Chapman, Jennifer Pizzano, Mark Bookbinder, Debbie Gordon, Kim Davenport, Gregory Cadelina, Madeline A. Dorso, Emma Rousseau, Christopher Kuhlberg, Morena Scopel, Rebecca Conrad, William L. Corwin, Goutham Pattabiraman, Wendy Wu, Raushan Wilson, Christine Jones, John Corradi, Keith R. Hornberger, Angela M. Cacace, Ignacio J. Juncadella, Kathryn D. Smith. Preclinical activity of an orally bioavailable PROTAC pan-KRAS degrader versus inhibitors in mutant KRAS models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1):Abstract nr PR008.

Cancer ResearchVol. 86(5_Supplement_1)
Arvinas (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.