Where I end and you begin: Subjectification and autonomy revisited

This article examines the intersection of autonomy, freedom, and moral responsibility in environmental education, focusing on how educational frameworks can address collective environmental problems. Using Biesta’s educational theory—qualification, socialization, and subjectification—the article explores how environmental education traditionally emphasizes individual agency, which may conflict with the need for collective ethical norms to address environmental challenges. By analyzing negative and positive conceptions of freedom as defined by Berlin, the article critiques these approaches as too individualistic for fostering a responsible and ethical environmental ethos. Drawing on Arendt’s notions of freedom, it proposes a framework for environmental education that balances socialization with the development of autonomous, morally responsible individuals. This approach aims to harmonize individual moral agency with collective responsibility, offering a philosophically grounded vision for cultivating ethical attitudes toward environmental sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2026.2625027
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where I end and you begin: Subjectification and autonomy revisited

Thijs Loonstra, Zoë Robaey
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Where I end and you begin: Subjectification and autonomy revisited

Thijs Loonstra, Zoë Robaey
article en

Abstract

This article examines the intersection of autonomy, freedom, and moral responsibility in environmental education, focusing on how educational frameworks can address collective environmental problems. Using Biesta’s educational theory—qualification, socialization, and subjectification—the article explores how environmental education traditionally emphasizes individual agency, which may conflict with the need for collective ethical norms to address environmental challenges. By analyzing negative and positive conceptions of freedom as defined by Berlin, the article critiques these approaches as too individualistic for fostering a responsible and ethical environmental ethos. Drawing on Arendt’s notions of freedom, it proposes a framework for environmental education that balances socialization with the development of autonomous, morally responsible individuals. This approach aims to harmonize individual moral agency with collective responsibility, offering a philosophically grounded vision for cultivating ethical attitudes toward environmental sustainability.

Educational Philosophy and Theory
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.