A Decade of Food and Drug Administration Medical Device Authorizations (2015–2025): Pathway, Specialty, and Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Trends

Abstract A comprehensive ten-year analysis of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) medical device authorizations by regulatory pathway, therapeutic specialty, and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) status provides a descriptive baseline for understanding how authorization volumes, pathways, and review timelines have evolved over time. This study analyzed U.S. FDA medical device authorizations from January 2015 to June 2025 using public databases. Device submissions were categorized by regulatory pathway (premarket notification (510(k)), premarket approval (PMA), PMA supplement, De Novo), medical specialty, and AI/ML status. Visual summaries of authorization volumes, review times, and specialty distributions were generated. Of 57,641 authorizations during the study period, including both new devices and authorized changes to previously cleared or approved devices—55.7% were via 510(k), 43.1% via PMA supplements, while PMA (0.62%) and De Novo (0.58%) represented a small fraction. Authorization times varied, with PMA taking the longest (median ∼337 days), followed by De Novo (median ∼315 days), 510(k) (median ∼128 days), and PMA supplements (median ∼29 days). AI/ML-enabled device authorizations increased over the study period, predominantly through the 510(k) pathway, with radiology accounting for the largest share. These findings provide a high-level descriptive view of authorization patterns and may support contextual understanding of FDA regulatory pathways and timelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Devices
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071334
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Decade of Food and Drug Administration Medical Device Authorizations (2015–2025): Pathway, Specialty, and Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Trends

Mehrad Bastani, Venkatesan Muthukrishnan
Journal of Medical Devices
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

A Decade of Food and Drug Administration Medical Device Authorizations (2015–2025): Pathway, Specialty, and Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Trends

Mehrad Bastani, Venkatesan Muthukrishnan
article en

Abstract

Abstract A comprehensive ten-year analysis of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) medical device authorizations by regulatory pathway, therapeutic specialty, and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) status provides a descriptive baseline for understanding how authorization volumes, pathways, and review timelines have evolved over time. This study analyzed U.S. FDA medical device authorizations from January 2015 to June 2025 using public databases. Device submissions were categorized by regulatory pathway (premarket notification (510(k)), premarket approval (PMA), PMA supplement, De Novo), medical specialty, and AI/ML status. Visual summaries of authorization volumes, review times, and specialty distributions were generated. Of 57,641 authorizations during the study period, including both new devices and authorized changes to previously cleared or approved devices—55.7% were via 510(k), 43.1% via PMA supplements, while PMA (0.62%) and De Novo (0.58%) represented a small fraction. Authorization times varied, with PMA taking the longest (median ∼337 days), followed by De Novo (median ∼315 days), 510(k) (median ∼128 days), and PMA supplements (median ∼29 days). AI/ML-enabled device authorizations increased over the study period, predominantly through the 510(k) pathway, with radiology accounting for the largest share. These findings provide a high-level descriptive view of authorization patterns and may support contextual understanding of FDA regulatory pathways and timelines.

Journal of Medical DevicesVol. 20(3)
Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.