Laparoscopy vs. Laparotomy for Management of Postpartum Complications—A Retrospective Cohort Study

<b>Background:</b> Postpartum complications requiring surgical intervention are challenging due to physiologic and anatomic changes. While laparotomy remains standard, laparoscopy is increasingly used. We compared outcomes of laparoscopic management of postpartum complications versus open management of postpartum complications. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing surgical intervention within three weeks postpartum at a single tertiary center between 2010 and 2023. Approach selection was primarily time-dependent, following an institutional practice change in 2020. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes were compared. <b>Results:</b> Sixty-two participants with postpartum complications necessitating surgical intervention were included: 54 in the laparotomy group and 8 who underwent laparoscopy. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. The main indication for laparoscopy was suspected uterine scar defects (<i>p</i> = 0.006), while laparotomy was obtained mainly in cases of suspected bleeding (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Both groups had comparable operative time, though the laparoscopy group had a shorter postoperative admission (<i>p</i> = 0.043). <b>Conclusions:</b> Laparoscopy is feasible for various postpartum complications. It offers comparable operative times to laparotomy with shorter postoperative admissions. Therefore, it is a promising alternative in selected cases when surgical expertise is available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051982
Primary Topic
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laparoscopy vs. Laparotomy for Management of Postpartum Complications—A Retrospective Cohort Study

Shimon Ginath, Ohad Gluck, Liat Mor, Ron Sagiv et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
article

Laparoscopy vs. Laparotomy for Management of Postpartum Complications—A Retrospective Cohort Study

Shimon Ginath, Ohad Gluck, Liat Mor, Ron Sagiv, Ran Keidar, Ron Sagiv, Amit Kreiner
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Postpartum complications requiring surgical intervention are challenging due to physiologic and anatomic changes. While laparotomy remains standard, laparoscopy is increasingly used. We compared outcomes of laparoscopic management of postpartum complications versus open management of postpartum complications. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing surgical intervention within three weeks postpartum at a single tertiary center between 2010 and 2023. Approach selection was primarily time-dependent, following an institutional practice change in 2020. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes were compared. <b>Results:</b> Sixty-two participants with postpartum complications necessitating surgical intervention were included: 54 in the laparotomy group and 8 who underwent laparoscopy. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. The main indication for laparoscopy was suspected uterine scar defects (<i>p</i> = 0.006), while laparotomy was obtained mainly in cases of suspected bleeding (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Both groups had comparable operative time, though the laparoscopy group had a shorter postoperative admission (<i>p</i> = 0.043). <b>Conclusions:</b> Laparoscopy is feasible for various postpartum complications. It offers comparable operative times to laparotomy with shorter postoperative admissions. Therefore, it is a promising alternative in selected cases when surgical expertise is available.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(5)
Tel Aviv University (IL), Wolfson Medical Center (IL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.