Weak-charge form-factor determination at the electron-ion collider

Determining the weak charge form factor, <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msub> <a:mi>F</a:mi> <a:mi>W</a:mi> </a:msub> <a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mi>Q</a:mi> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:msup> <a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo> </a:math> , of nuclei over a continuous range of momentum transfers, <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mn>0</e:mn> <e:mo>≲</e:mo> <e:msup> <e:mi>Q</e:mi> <e:mn>2</e:mn> </e:msup> <e:mo>≲</e:mo> <e:mn>0.1</e:mn> <e:mtext> </e:mtext> <e:mtext> </e:mtext> <e:msup> <e:mrow> <e:mi>GeV</e:mi> </e:mrow> <e:mrow> <e:mn>2</e:mn> </e:mrow> </e:msup> </e:math> , is essential for mapping out the distribution of neutrons in nuclei. The neutron density distribution has significant implications for a broad range of areas, including studies of nuclear structure, neutron stars, and physics beyond the Standard Model. Currently, our knowledge of <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:msub> <g:mi>F</g:mi> <g:mi>W</g:mi> </g:msub> <g:mo stretchy="false">(</g:mo> <g:msup> <g:mi>Q</g:mi> <g:mn>2</g:mn> </g:msup> <g:mo stretchy="false">)</g:mo> </g:math> comes primarily from fixed target experiments that measure the parity-violating asymmetry in coherent elastic electron-ion scattering. Fixed target experiments, such as CREX and PREX-1,2, have provided high-precision weak charge form factor extractions for the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mrow> <k:mmultiscripts> <k:mrow> <k:mi>Ca</k:mi> </k:mrow> <k:mprescripts/> <k:none/> <k:mrow> <k:mn>48</k:mn> </k:mrow> </k:mmultiscripts> </k:mrow> </k:math> and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:mrow> <m:mmultiscripts> <m:mrow> <m:mi>Pb</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mprescripts/> <m:none/> <m:mrow> <m:mn>208</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:mmultiscripts> </m:mrow> </m:math> nuclei, respectively. However, a major limitation of fixed target experiments is that they each provide data only at a single value of <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:msup> <o:mi>Q</o:mi> <o:mn>2</o:mn> </o:msup> </o:math> . With the proposed electron-ion collider (EIC) on the horizon, we explore its potential to impact the determination of the weak charge form factor. While it cannot compete with the precision of fixed target experiments, it can provide data over a wide and continuous range of <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <q:msup> <q:mi>Q</q:mi> <q:mn>2</q:mn> </q:msup> </q:math> values, and for a wide variety of nuclei. We show that with data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <s:mi mathvariant="script">L</s:mi> <s:mo>∼</s:mo> <s:mn>500</s:mn> <s:mo>/</s:mo> <s:mi>A</s:mi> <s:mtext> </s:mtext> <s:mtext> </s:mtext> <s:mrow> <s:msup> <s:mrow> <s:mi>fb</s:mi> </s:mrow> <s:mrow> <s:mo>−</s:mo> <s:mn>1</s:mn> </s:mrow> </s:msup> </s:mrow> </s:math> , where <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <v:mi>A</v:mi> </v:math> is the nucleus atomic weight, the EIC can significantly impact constraints by lifting degeneracies in theoretical models of the neutron density distribution. Ensuring EIC detector coverage at low <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <x:msup> <x:mi>Q</x:mi> <x:mn>2</x:mn> </x:msup> </x:math> and large negative pseudorapidities will be essential for such <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <z:msub> <z:mi>F</z:mi> <z:mi>W</z:mi> </z:msub> <z:mo stretchy="false">(</z:mo> <z:msup> <z:mi>Q</z:mi> <z:mn>2</z:mn> </z:msup> <z:mo stretchy="false">)</z:mo> </z:math> measurements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/lnqv-bltq
Primary Topic
Atomic and Molecular Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weak-charge form-factor determination at the electron-ion collider

Anonymous
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Atomic and Molecular Physics
article

Weak-charge form-factor determination at the electron-ion collider

Anonymous
article en

Abstract

Determining the weak charge form factor, <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msub> <a:mi>F</a:mi> <a:mi>W</a:mi> </a:msub> <a:mo stretchy="false">(</a:mo> <a:msup> <a:mi>Q</a:mi> <a:mn>2</a:mn> </a:msup> <a:mo stretchy="false">)</a:mo> </a:math> , of nuclei over a continuous range of momentum transfers, <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mn>0</e:mn> <e:mo>≲</e:mo> <e:msup> <e:mi>Q</e:mi> <e:mn>2</e:mn> </e:msup> <e:mo>≲</e:mo> <e:mn>0.1</e:mn> <e:mtext> </e:mtext> <e:mtext> </e:mtext> <e:msup> <e:mrow> <e:mi>GeV</e:mi> </e:mrow> <e:mrow> <e:mn>2</e:mn> </e:mrow> </e:msup> </e:math> , is essential for mapping out the distribution of neutrons in nuclei. The neutron density distribution has significant implications for a broad range of areas, including studies of nuclear structure, neutron stars, and physics beyond the Standard Model. Currently, our knowledge of <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:msub> <g:mi>F</g:mi> <g:mi>W</g:mi> </g:msub> <g:mo stretchy="false">(</g:mo> <g:msup> <g:mi>Q</g:mi> <g:mn>2</g:mn> </g:msup> <g:mo stretchy="false">)</g:mo> </g:math> comes primarily from fixed target experiments that measure the parity-violating asymmetry in coherent elastic electron-ion scattering. Fixed target experiments, such as CREX and PREX-1,2, have provided high-precision weak charge form factor extractions for the <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mrow> <k:mmultiscripts> <k:mrow> <k:mi>Ca</k:mi> </k:mrow> <k:mprescripts/> <k:none/> <k:mrow> <k:mn>48</k:mn> </k:mrow> </k:mmultiscripts> </k:mrow> </k:math> and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:mrow> <m:mmultiscripts> <m:mrow> <m:mi>Pb</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mprescripts/> <m:none/> <m:mrow> <m:mn>208</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:mmultiscripts> </m:mrow> </m:math> nuclei, respectively. However, a major limitation of fixed target experiments is that they each provide data only at a single value of <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:msup> <o:mi>Q</o:mi> <o:mn>2</o:mn> </o:msup> </o:math> . With the proposed electron-ion collider (EIC) on the horizon, we explore its potential to impact the determination of the weak charge form factor. While it cannot compete with the precision of fixed target experiments, it can provide data over a wide and continuous range of <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <q:msup> <q:mi>Q</q:mi> <q:mn>2</q:mn> </q:msup> </q:math> values, and for a wide variety of nuclei. We show that with data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <s:mi mathvariant="script">L</s:mi> <s:mo>∼</s:mo> <s:mn>500</s:mn> <s:mo>/</s:mo> <s:mi>A</s:mi> <s:mtext> </s:mtext> <s:mtext> </s:mtext> <s:mrow> <s:msup> <s:mrow> <s:mi>fb</s:mi> </s:mrow> <s:mrow> <s:mo>−</s:mo> <s:mn>1</s:mn> </s:mrow> </s:msup> </s:mrow> </s:math> , where <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <v:mi>A</v:mi> </v:math> is the nucleus atomic weight, the EIC can significantly impact constraints by lifting degeneracies in theoretical models of the neutron density distribution. Ensuring EIC detector coverage at low <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <x:msup> <x:mi>Q</x:mi> <x:mn>2</x:mn> </x:msup> </x:math> and large negative pseudorapidities will be essential for such <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <z:msub> <z:mi>F</z:mi> <z:mi>W</z:mi> </z:msub> <z:mo stretchy="false">(</z:mo> <z:msup> <z:mi>Q</z:mi> <z:mn>2</z:mn> </z:msup> <z:mo stretchy="false">)</z:mo> </z:math> measurements.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 113(5)
Brookhaven National Laboratory (US), University of Colorado System (US), University of North Georgia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Atomic and Molecular Physics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.