Regulatory and Spectrum Challenges for Passive Space Weather Monitoring

Space weather monitoring depends critically on passive sensor systems that detect and measure natural solar and geospace emissions without transmitting radio frequency energy. These include riometers, solar radio monitors, interplanetary scintillation detectors, GNSS-based ionospheric sensors, and broadband solar spectrographs that enable the provision of critical data required to forecast geomagnetic storms, protect critical infrastructures, and support aviation services, satellite operations, and defense services. However, with the increasing proliferation of radiocommunication technologies such as 5G/6G networks, dense HF/VHF/UHF deployments, and large constellations of low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites, the interference threat to these exceptionally sensitive receivers has grown. Most of these operate near the thermal noise floor and thus require strict protection criteria to ensure continuity of data. This review and perspective article provides a cross-disciplinary synthesis of scientific requirements, documented RFI case studies, and ongoing regulatory developments related to spectrum protection for passive space weather sensors. It systematically integrates perspectives on physical, technical, and regulatory aspects that are typically addressed separately in the literature. The article reviews the operating principles of major sensor classes and analyzes documented RFI cases affecting GNSS, riometers, CALLISTO, BINGO, and systems impacted by LEO satellite emissions, drawing from existing reports and regulatory submissions. Building on this evidence base, the work comparatively evaluates regulatory methods under consideration for WRC-27 shows that hybrid approaches combining primary allocations in core observation bands with secondary status and coordination procedures in adjacent bands offer the most viable path forward. This synthesis contextualizes and analyzes how technical protection criteria can be integrated with existing and evolving regulatory instruments to inform spectrum governance. The study concludes that without coordinated international spectrum management incorporating explicit protection thresholds and registration procedures, the long-term viability of space weather monitoring infrastructure faces significant risk in an increasingly congested radio frequency environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Universe
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/universe12030074
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory and Spectrum Challenges for Passive Space Weather Monitoring

Valéria Leite, T. Aurélio Bakaus,  Alison de O. Moraes, Marco Antonio Bockoski de Bockoski de Paula et al.
Universe
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Regulatory and Spectrum Challenges for Passive Space Weather Monitoring

Valéria Leite, T. Aurélio Bakaus,  Alison de O. Moraes, Marco Antonio Bockoski de Bockoski de Paula, Mateus Cardoso
article en

Abstract

Space weather monitoring depends critically on passive sensor systems that detect and measure natural solar and geospace emissions without transmitting radio frequency energy. These include riometers, solar radio monitors, interplanetary scintillation detectors, GNSS-based ionospheric sensors, and broadband solar spectrographs that enable the provision of critical data required to forecast geomagnetic storms, protect critical infrastructures, and support aviation services, satellite operations, and defense services. However, with the increasing proliferation of radiocommunication technologies such as 5G/6G networks, dense HF/VHF/UHF deployments, and large constellations of low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites, the interference threat to these exceptionally sensitive receivers has grown. Most of these operate near the thermal noise floor and thus require strict protection criteria to ensure continuity of data. This review and perspective article provides a cross-disciplinary synthesis of scientific requirements, documented RFI case studies, and ongoing regulatory developments related to spectrum protection for passive space weather sensors. It systematically integrates perspectives on physical, technical, and regulatory aspects that are typically addressed separately in the literature. The article reviews the operating principles of major sensor classes and analyzes documented RFI cases affecting GNSS, riometers, CALLISTO, BINGO, and systems impacted by LEO satellite emissions, drawing from existing reports and regulatory submissions. Building on this evidence base, the work comparatively evaluates regulatory methods under consideration for WRC-27 shows that hybrid approaches combining primary allocations in core observation bands with secondary status and coordination procedures in adjacent bands offer the most viable path forward. This synthesis contextualizes and analyzes how technical protection criteria can be integrated with existing and evolving regulatory instruments to inform spectrum governance. The study concludes that without coordinated international spectrum management incorporating explicit protection thresholds and registration procedures, the long-term viability of space weather monitoring infrastructure faces significant risk in an increasingly congested radio frequency environment.

UniverseVol. 12(3)
Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (BR), Universidade de Taubaté (BR), Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (BR), Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (BR), National Water Agency (BR)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.