Intrusion Detection in Fog Computing: A Systematic Review of Security Advances and Challenges

Fog computing extends cloud services to the network edge to support low-latency IoT applications. However, since fog environments are distributed and resource-constrained, intrusion detection systems must be adapted to defend against cyberattacks while keeping computation and communication overhead minimal. This systematic review presents research on intrusion detection systems (IDSs) for fog computing and synthesizes advances and research gaps. The study was guided by the “Preferred-Reporting-Items for-Systematic-Reviews-and-Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) framework. Scopus and Web of Science were searched in the title field using TITLE/TI = (“intrusion detection” AND “fog computing”) for 2021–2025. The inclusion criteria were (i) 2021–2025 publications, (ii) journal or conference papers, (iii) English language, and (iv) open access availability; duplicates were removed programmatically using a DOI-first key with a title, year, and author alternative. The search identified 8560 records, of which 4905 were unique and included for qualitative grouping and bibliometric synthesis. Metadata (year, venue, authors, affiliations, keywords, and citations) were extracted and analyzed in Python to compute trends and collaboration. Intrusion detection systems in fog networks were categorized into traditional/signature-based, machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid/ensemble. Hybrid and DL approaches reported accuracy ranging from 95 to 99% on benchmark datasets (such as NSL-KDD, UNSW-NB15, CIC-IDS2017, KDD99, BoT-IoT). Notable bottlenecks included computational load relative to real-time latency on resource-constrained nodes, elevated false-positive rates for anomaly detection under concept drift, limited generalization to unseen attacks, privacy risks from centralizing data, and limited real-world validation. Bibliometric analyses highlighted the field’s concentration in fast-turnaround, open-access journals such as IEEE Access and Sensors, as well as a small number of highly collaborative author clusters, alongside dominant terms such as “learning,” “federated,” “ensemble,” “lightweight,” and “explainability.” Emerging directions include federated and distributed training to preserve privacy, as well as online/continual learning adaptation. Future work should consist of real-world evaluation of fog networks, ultra-lightweight yet adaptive hybrid IDS, self-learning, and secure cooperative frameworks. These insights help researchers select appropriate IDS models for fog networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15030169
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intrusion Detection in Fog Computing: A Systematic Review of Security Advances and Challenges

Tshimangadzo Mavin Tshilongamulenzhe, Nyashadzashe Tamuka, Solly P. Maswikaneng, Tonderai Muchenje et al.
Computers
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

Intrusion Detection in Fog Computing: A Systematic Review of Security Advances and Challenges

Tshimangadzo Mavin Tshilongamulenzhe, Nyashadzashe Tamuka, Solly P. Maswikaneng, Tonderai Muchenje, Topside E. Mathonsi, Thomas Otieno Olwal
article en

Abstract

Fog computing extends cloud services to the network edge to support low-latency IoT applications. However, since fog environments are distributed and resource-constrained, intrusion detection systems must be adapted to defend against cyberattacks while keeping computation and communication overhead minimal. This systematic review presents research on intrusion detection systems (IDSs) for fog computing and synthesizes advances and research gaps. The study was guided by the “Preferred-Reporting-Items for-Systematic-Reviews-and-Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) framework. Scopus and Web of Science were searched in the title field using TITLE/TI = (“intrusion detection” AND “fog computing”) for 2021–2025. The inclusion criteria were (i) 2021–2025 publications, (ii) journal or conference papers, (iii) English language, and (iv) open access availability; duplicates were removed programmatically using a DOI-first key with a title, year, and author alternative. The search identified 8560 records, of which 4905 were unique and included for qualitative grouping and bibliometric synthesis. Metadata (year, venue, authors, affiliations, keywords, and citations) were extracted and analyzed in Python to compute trends and collaboration. Intrusion detection systems in fog networks were categorized into traditional/signature-based, machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid/ensemble. Hybrid and DL approaches reported accuracy ranging from 95 to 99% on benchmark datasets (such as NSL-KDD, UNSW-NB15, CIC-IDS2017, KDD99, BoT-IoT). Notable bottlenecks included computational load relative to real-time latency on resource-constrained nodes, elevated false-positive rates for anomaly detection under concept drift, limited generalization to unseen attacks, privacy risks from centralizing data, and limited real-world validation. Bibliometric analyses highlighted the field’s concentration in fast-turnaround, open-access journals such as IEEE Access and Sensors, as well as a small number of highly collaborative author clusters, alongside dominant terms such as “learning,” “federated,” “ensemble,” “lightweight,” and “explainability.” Emerging directions include federated and distributed training to preserve privacy, as well as online/continual learning adaptation. Future work should consist of real-world evaluation of fog networks, ultra-lightweight yet adaptive hybrid IDS, self-learning, and secure cooperative frameworks. These insights help researchers select appropriate IDS models for fog networks.

ComputersVol. 15(3)
Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.