Facial Recognition on Trial:Data Protection, Discrimination, and the Ethics of Algorithmic Governance in Policing

This article examines two key ethical issues surrounding the use of facial recognition technology in policing – data protection and discrimination. It investigates how these issues are mobilised and understood in a landmark UK case, Ed Bridges v South Wales Police. By closely analysing legal documents, I show how the court relied on policy as a performative and corrective measure to address ethical issues. I argue that this approach overlooks the broader range of social justice issues that emerge when AI technologies intersect with sociopolitical contexts and institutional practices. These include the intrusiveness of AI in everyday life, racial biases embedded in its design and application, and the institutional racism within which the technology operates. Ultimately, these juridical questions reveal deeper tensions between reformist and abolitionist perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (King's College London)
Published
2026-03-09
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facial Recognition on Trial:Data Protection, Discrimination, and the Ethics of Algorithmic Governance in Policing

Francesca; id_orcid 0000-0002-9121-9985 Meloni
Research Portal (King's College London)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Facial Recognition on Trial:Data Protection, Discrimination, and the Ethics of Algorithmic Governance in Policing

Francesca; id_orcid 0000-0002-9121-9985 Meloni
article en

Abstract

This article examines two key ethical issues surrounding the use of facial recognition technology in policing – data protection and discrimination. It investigates how these issues are mobilised and understood in a landmark UK case, Ed Bridges v South Wales Police. By closely analysing legal documents, I show how the court relied on policy as a performative and corrective measure to address ethical issues. I argue that this approach overlooks the broader range of social justice issues that emerge when AI technologies intersect with sociopolitical contexts and institutional practices. These include the intrusiveness of AI in everyday life, racial biases embedded in its design and application, and the institutional racism within which the technology operates. Ultimately, these juridical questions reveal deeper tensions between reformist and abolitionist perspectives.

Research Portal (King's College London)
King's College School (GB)
King's College London, University of Oxford
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.