Reimagining early years services to address childhood inequities: learning from the Born in Bradford evaluation of a Better Start Bradford

'A Better Start' was a 10-year (2015-2025), £215 million initiative funded by the National Lottery Community Fund, supporting five areas in England to address inequalities in the early years of life across socio-emotional development, language and communication, and nutrition outcomes. It aimed to provide a place-based, test-and-learn model, putting parents at the heart of design and delivery. As a result, each of the five sites developed and implemented distinct local programmes.The Better Start Bradford programme delivered multiple preventative interventions across the outcome domains. Bradford was the only site to embed a research partner, Born in Bradford, from the very beginning. This enabled the establishment of a fully resourced research hub-the Better Start Bradford Innovation Hub, which included the world's first interventional birth cohort, Born in Bradford's Better Start, designed to efficiently evaluate multiple interventions simultaneously. This evaluation has provided in-depth learning about the inequalities faced in contemporary urban populations and evidence of the implementation and impact of multiple early years interventions.In this review, we reflect on our 'decade of discovery': what worked well, what we have learnt about evaluating and delivering early years prevention at scale, and what we would do differently if we had the opportunity again. Examples of what worked well include the place-based model, the test-and-learn approach, a robust evaluation infrastructure and community empowerment. Our learning has evidenced important changes for future programmes and for commissioners, chief among them: complex inequalities cannot be resolved through the delivery of individual or scattered interventions. This collective learning points to a clear call for change to create a jointly commissioned, appropriately funded and continuously evaluated early years system, underpinned by a long-term commitment to prevent inequity in the early-years before it becomes entrenched.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Published
2026-03-02
Primary Topic
Infant Development and Preterm Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining early years services to address childhood inequities: learning from the Born in Bradford evaluation of a Better Start Bradford

Ke Pickett, K.E. Mooney, G. Thornton, S. Goldfeld et al.
White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Infant Development and Preterm Care
article

Reimagining early years services to address childhood inequities: learning from the Born in Bradford evaluation of a Better Start Bradford

Ke Pickett, K.E. Mooney, G. Thornton, S. Goldfeld, J. Dickerson, S. Bhopal, J. Wright, R.R.C. McEachan, S. Ahern, C. Bowyer-Crane, S.L. Blower, M. Bryant, K. Bennet
article en

Abstract

'A Better Start' was a 10-year (2015-2025), £215 million initiative funded by the National Lottery Community Fund, supporting five areas in England to address inequalities in the early years of life across socio-emotional development, language and communication, and nutrition outcomes. It aimed to provide a place-based, test-and-learn model, putting parents at the heart of design and delivery. As a result, each of the five sites developed and implemented distinct local programmes.The Better Start Bradford programme delivered multiple preventative interventions across the outcome domains. Bradford was the only site to embed a research partner, Born in Bradford, from the very beginning. This enabled the establishment of a fully resourced research hub-the Better Start Bradford Innovation Hub, which included the world's first interventional birth cohort, Born in Bradford's Better Start, designed to efficiently evaluate multiple interventions simultaneously. This evaluation has provided in-depth learning about the inequalities faced in contemporary urban populations and evidence of the implementation and impact of multiple early years interventions.In this review, we reflect on our 'decade of discovery': what worked well, what we have learnt about evaluating and delivering early years prevention at scale, and what we would do differently if we had the opportunity again. Examples of what worked well include the place-based model, the test-and-learn approach, a robust evaluation infrastructure and community empowerment. Our learning has evidenced important changes for future programmes and for commissioners, chief among them: complex inequalities cannot be resolved through the delivery of individual or scattered interventions. This collective learning points to a clear call for change to create a jointly commissioned, appropriately funded and continuously evaluated early years system, underpinned by a long-term commitment to prevent inequity in the early-years before it becomes entrenched.

White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, National Lottery Community Fund, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Infant Development and Preterm Care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.