Lonely Students, Different Needs: How Emotional and Social Loneliness Shape Expectations for Social Robots

Loneliness is a common issue among university students and has been associated with poorer mental health and reduced well-being. According to classic theory, there are two types of loneliness: emotional loneliness, which results from a lack of close attachments, and social loneliness, which is associated with deficits in broader peer networks. However, research into human–robot interaction rarely considers how these two forms of loneliness manifest in people's desire for social robots. This report presents the qualitative findings of semi-structured interviews with 25 students. These students were invited based on their scores for emotional and social loneliness, with the aim of representing a broad range of loneliness profiles. Participants observed standardised demonstrations of three social robots, Pepper, Nao and Furhat, and discussed their attitudes towards them, their potential roles and designs. Across the different profiles, the students generally expressed an openness to the idea of social robots. However, a clear gradient emerged: students who reported higher levels of loneliness tended to view robots as companions and conversational partners, whereas students who reported lower levels of loneliness emphasised the robots’ potential for providing instrumental support and the importance of maintaining stricter boundaries. Loneliness profiles therefore provide a promising lens for thinking about how to design role-appropriate and ethically sensitive robot behaviours and forms for student settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3776734.3794491
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lonely Students, Different Needs: How Emotional and Social Loneliness Shape Expectations for Social Robots

Debbie Meharg, Emilia Sobolewska, Khristin Fabian, Franziska Elisabeth Heck
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Lonely Students, Different Needs: How Emotional and Social Loneliness Shape Expectations for Social Robots

Debbie Meharg, Emilia Sobolewska, Khristin Fabian, Franziska Elisabeth Heck
article en

Abstract

Loneliness is a common issue among university students and has been associated with poorer mental health and reduced well-being. According to classic theory, there are two types of loneliness: emotional loneliness, which results from a lack of close attachments, and social loneliness, which is associated with deficits in broader peer networks. However, research into human–robot interaction rarely considers how these two forms of loneliness manifest in people's desire for social robots. This report presents the qualitative findings of semi-structured interviews with 25 students. These students were invited based on their scores for emotional and social loneliness, with the aim of representing a broad range of loneliness profiles. Participants observed standardised demonstrations of three social robots, Pepper, Nao and Furhat, and discussed their attitudes towards them, their potential roles and designs. Across the different profiles, the students generally expressed an openness to the idea of social robots. However, a clear gradient emerged: students who reported higher levels of loneliness tended to view robots as companions and conversational partners, whereas students who reported lower levels of loneliness emphasised the robots’ potential for providing instrumental support and the importance of maintaining stricter boundaries. Loneliness profiles therefore provide a promising lens for thinking about how to design role-appropriate and ethically sensitive robot behaviours and forms for student settings.

University of Aberdeen (GB), Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.