Reliability and utility of the Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score f optimizing mucosal visualization during esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Background and study aims: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a key tool for diagnosing upper gastrointestinal lesions, but its accuracy relies on optimal mucosal visualization. Currently, there are few validated instruments to objectively assess mucosal cleanliness. This study aimed to validate the Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score (TUGCS) and explore its association with lesion detection. Patients and methods: In this prospective, single-center study, 175 patients undergoing diagnostic EGD were enrolled. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the TUGCS was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) among expert and non-expert endoscopists. Secondary outcomes included detection of endoscopic lesions, which were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, procedure duration, and indication. Additional analyses included Spearman’s correlation and z-tests. Results: TUGCS demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.93-0.96) and intra-observer agreement (ICC = 0.896 for non-experts, 0.924 for experts). The score correlated strongly with subjective assessments (P = 0.68; P < 0.001). Both TUGCS as a continuous variable and TUGCS ≥ 6 were independently associated with increased detection of gastroduodenal findings as a composite outcome, when adjusted for age, sex, simethicone use, and procedure duration. <b>Conclusions:</b> TUGCS is a reliable and reproducible tool across varying levels of endoscopic expertise. Higher scores were associated with improved detection of gastroduodenal pathology, supporting its utility as a quality metric in EGD. Multicenter studies are warranted to validate its role in broader clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2781-6570
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and utility of the Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score f optimizing mucosal visualization during esophagogastroduodenoscopy

J.P. Guerrero-Cabrera, Guillermo Rosales-Sotomayor, L. García, David Aguirre-Villarreal et al.
Endoscopy International Open
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Reliability and utility of the Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score f optimizing mucosal visualization during esophagogastroduodenoscopy

J.P. Guerrero-Cabrera, Guillermo Rosales-Sotomayor, L. García, David Aguirre-Villarreal, Richard Taubert, Alfonso J. Fernandez-Ramirez, Berenice M Román-Calleja, Sergio A. Sánchez‐Luna, I. Hurtado-Díaz de León, Rafael Rafael Barreto-Zuñiga, Arturo Navarro-Sánchez, Erick Jasso-Baltazar, Hiram Noel Tadeo-Espinoza
article en

Abstract

Background and study aims: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is a key tool for diagnosing upper gastrointestinal lesions, but its accuracy relies on optimal mucosal visualization. Currently, there are few validated instruments to objectively assess mucosal cleanliness. This study aimed to validate the Toronto Upper Gastrointestinal Cleaning Score (TUGCS) and explore its association with lesion detection. Patients and methods: In this prospective, single-center study, 175 patients undergoing diagnostic EGD were enrolled. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the TUGCS was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) among expert and non-expert endoscopists. Secondary outcomes included detection of endoscopic lesions, which were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression adjusted for age, procedure duration, and indication. Additional analyses included Spearman’s correlation and z-tests. Results: TUGCS demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.93-0.96) and intra-observer agreement (ICC = 0.896 for non-experts, 0.924 for experts). The score correlated strongly with subjective assessments (P = 0.68; P < 0.001). Both TUGCS as a continuous variable and TUGCS ≥ 6 were independently associated with increased detection of gastroduodenal findings as a composite outcome, when adjusted for age, sex, simethicone use, and procedure duration. <b>Conclusions:</b> TUGCS is a reliable and reproducible tool across varying levels of endoscopic expertise. Higher scores were associated with improved detection of gastroduodenal pathology, supporting its utility as a quality metric in EGD. Multicenter studies are warranted to validate its role in broader clinical practice.

Endoscopy International Open
Allegheny Health Network (US), Mexican Social Security Institute (MX), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.