Basin-scale groundwater recharge potential mapping in the Yamuna river basin using AHP and MIF with long-term groundwater level analysis

ABSTRACT Declining groundwater levels and spatially heterogeneous recharge in semi-arid regions necessitate a reliable delineation of groundwater potential recharge zones (GWPRZ) at the basin scale. Although GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis is widely applied, most studies are confined to small watersheds and lack of long-term field validation. This study evaluates groundwater recharge potential across the Yamuna Basin (∼366,000 km2) using two decision-making frameworks: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Multi-Influencing Factor (MIF) method. Nine thematic datasets: geology, geomorphology, soil, slope, topography, rainfall, land use/land cover, drainage density, and lineament density were integrated within a harmonised GIS environment. AHP employed pairwise comparisons to derive factor weights, while MIF quantified direct and indirect factor influences. Model outputs were validated using long-term groundwater level data (2014–2023) from approximately 2,400 observation wells. Results show that AHP classified 20.5% of the basin as high to very high recharge potential, compared to 16.7% using MIF. The AHP model exhibited stronger agreement with observed groundwater level fluctuations (R2 = 0.829, Po ± 1 = 75.8%, AUC = 0.725) than MIF (R2 = 0.769, Po ± 1 = 75.0%, AUC = 0.719). Despite pronounced hydrogeological heterogeneity, both approaches demonstrated robust performance, highlighting their applicability for basin-scale groundwater recharge assessment and decision support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydroinformatics
Published
2026-02-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2026.146
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Basin-scale groundwater recharge potential mapping in the Yamuna river basin using AHP and MIF with long-term groundwater level analysis

Pramod Kumar Sharma, Sumant Kumar, Pardeep Kumar
Journal of Hydroinformatics
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
article

Basin-scale groundwater recharge potential mapping in the Yamuna river basin using AHP and MIF with long-term groundwater level analysis

Pramod Kumar Sharma, Sumant Kumar, Pardeep Kumar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Declining groundwater levels and spatially heterogeneous recharge in semi-arid regions necessitate a reliable delineation of groundwater potential recharge zones (GWPRZ) at the basin scale. Although GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis is widely applied, most studies are confined to small watersheds and lack of long-term field validation. This study evaluates groundwater recharge potential across the Yamuna Basin (∼366,000 km2) using two decision-making frameworks: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Multi-Influencing Factor (MIF) method. Nine thematic datasets: geology, geomorphology, soil, slope, topography, rainfall, land use/land cover, drainage density, and lineament density were integrated within a harmonised GIS environment. AHP employed pairwise comparisons to derive factor weights, while MIF quantified direct and indirect factor influences. Model outputs were validated using long-term groundwater level data (2014–2023) from approximately 2,400 observation wells. Results show that AHP classified 20.5% of the basin as high to very high recharge potential, compared to 16.7% using MIF. The AHP model exhibited stronger agreement with observed groundwater level fluctuations (R2 = 0.829, Po ± 1 = 75.8%, AUC = 0.725) than MIF (R2 = 0.769, Po ± 1 = 75.0%, AUC = 0.719). Despite pronounced hydrogeological heterogeneity, both approaches demonstrated robust performance, highlighting their applicability for basin-scale groundwater recharge assessment and decision support.

Journal of HydroinformaticsVol. 28(3)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN), National Institute of Hydrology (IN)
Indian Space Research Organisation, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, National Remote Sensing Centre, U.S. Geological Survey
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Groundwater and Watershed Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.