EU vs. China: battle for trade and investments within a small open economy

Purpose – Small open economies face various economic challenges that require different institutional solutions. This study presents a quantitative analysis of data collected through a Delphi survey, examining the current state and potential trends in Serbia’s relations with the EU and China. The research offers insights into how a small economy, such as Serbia, might strategically plan its development by implementing experts’ opinions. Research methodology – Delphi analysis was employed as the primary methodological tool. It provided experts’ opinions about Serbia’s position vis-à-vis the EU and China regarding foreign direct investments and trade flows. Findings – Experts believe Serbia will maintain cooperation with both the EU and China but are more optimistic related to economic relations with China. While the EU remains an important partner, stronger economic ties with China are unlikely to diminish the EU’s role. Research limitations – Conducting the Delphi survey online introduced constraints, namely differences between online and in-person opinions, a limited number of questions given to experts, time restrictions, and the scarcity of publicly available data for expert analysis. Practical implications – Survey findings could be used by relevant Government bodies and institutions to formulate policies or scenarios for emergency situations. Originality/Value – This type of survey was not conducted in Serbia before, nor were there other relevant papers that could be used to compare the results, which testifies to its originality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Management and Economics Engineering
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3846/bmee.2026.25457
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EU vs. China: battle for trade and investments within a small open economy

Filip Ž. Bugarčić, Katarina Zakić, Sanja Filipović
Business Management and Economics Engineering
Belt and Road Initiative
article

EU vs. China: battle for trade and investments within a small open economy

Filip Ž. Bugarčić, Katarina Zakić, Sanja Filipović
article en

Abstract

Purpose – Small open economies face various economic challenges that require different institutional solutions. This study presents a quantitative analysis of data collected through a Delphi survey, examining the current state and potential trends in Serbia’s relations with the EU and China. The research offers insights into how a small economy, such as Serbia, might strategically plan its development by implementing experts’ opinions. Research methodology – Delphi analysis was employed as the primary methodological tool. It provided experts’ opinions about Serbia’s position vis-à-vis the EU and China regarding foreign direct investments and trade flows. Findings – Experts believe Serbia will maintain cooperation with both the EU and China but are more optimistic related to economic relations with China. While the EU remains an important partner, stronger economic ties with China are unlikely to diminish the EU’s role. Research limitations – Conducting the Delphi survey online introduced constraints, namely differences between online and in-person opinions, a limited number of questions given to experts, time restrictions, and the scarcity of publicly available data for expert analysis. Practical implications – Survey findings could be used by relevant Government bodies and institutions to formulate policies or scenarios for emergency situations. Originality/Value – This type of survey was not conducted in Serbia before, nor were there other relevant papers that could be used to compare the results, which testifies to its originality.

Business Management and Economics EngineeringVol. 24(1)
University of Kragujevac (RS), Singidunum University (RS), Institute of International Politics and Economics (RS)
Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.