Fairness-Aware Question Answering for Intelligent Assistants

Voice-based question-answering (QA) systems (e.g., Alexa, Siri, ChatGPT) are increasingly relied upon by diverse users, including individuals with visual impairments, low literacy, and the elderly, across domains such as healthcare, workplaces, and hands-free environments. As reliance on such voice-based QA systems grows across these user populations and applications, the shift away from traditional list-based search interfaces introduces new challenges, particularly in how information is presented. While such systems are effective at delivering concise, fact-based answers, this mode of information presentation often limits exposure to multiple perspectives, thereby reinforcing biases that can shape user perceptions, preferences, and broader societal attitudes. This limitation is particularly consequential for stakeholders such as policymakers, healthcare professionals, and researchers, who rely on balanced and diverse information to support informed decision-making. Accordingly, this dissertation examines fairness in multi-perspective rankings within top-heavy voice-based QA systems, focusing on the ranking stage, where disproportionate exposure of perspectives can substantially influence user understanding and downstream decisions. To this end, the dissertation introduces methods for estimating fairness in rankings under both single-attribute and multi-attribute settings, empirically distinguishes fairness from diversity, and adopts a multidimensional framework for evaluating and mitigating biases in ranked outputs to promote balanced representation of perspectives. Additionally, it synthesises insights from conversational search, information science, psychology, cognitive science, and acoustics to characterise relevant resources and experimental settings, and to identify new research directions for investigating user biases in voice-based QA systems, thereby advancing fairness-aware QA for intelligent assistants. Awarded by: RMIT University, Naarm/Melbourne, Australia on 11 March 2025. Supervised by: Damiano Spina, Falk Scholer, W. Bruce Croft. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25439/rmt.29624996.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM SIGIR Forum
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3799914.3799937
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fairness-Aware Question Answering for Intelligent Assistants

Sachin Pathiyan Cherumanal
ACM SIGIR Forum
AI in Service Interactions
article

Fairness-Aware Question Answering for Intelligent Assistants

Sachin Pathiyan Cherumanal
article en

Abstract

Voice-based question-answering (QA) systems (e.g., Alexa, Siri, ChatGPT) are increasingly relied upon by diverse users, including individuals with visual impairments, low literacy, and the elderly, across domains such as healthcare, workplaces, and hands-free environments. As reliance on such voice-based QA systems grows across these user populations and applications, the shift away from traditional list-based search interfaces introduces new challenges, particularly in how information is presented. While such systems are effective at delivering concise, fact-based answers, this mode of information presentation often limits exposure to multiple perspectives, thereby reinforcing biases that can shape user perceptions, preferences, and broader societal attitudes. This limitation is particularly consequential for stakeholders such as policymakers, healthcare professionals, and researchers, who rely on balanced and diverse information to support informed decision-making. Accordingly, this dissertation examines fairness in multi-perspective rankings within top-heavy voice-based QA systems, focusing on the ranking stage, where disproportionate exposure of perspectives can substantially influence user understanding and downstream decisions. To this end, the dissertation introduces methods for estimating fairness in rankings under both single-attribute and multi-attribute settings, empirically distinguishes fairness from diversity, and adopts a multidimensional framework for evaluating and mitigating biases in ranked outputs to promote balanced representation of perspectives. Additionally, it synthesises insights from conversational search, information science, psychology, cognitive science, and acoustics to characterise relevant resources and experimental settings, and to identify new research directions for investigating user biases in voice-based QA systems, thereby advancing fairness-aware QA for intelligent assistants. Awarded by: RMIT University, Naarm/Melbourne, Australia on 11 March 2025. Supervised by: Damiano Spina, Falk Scholer, W. Bruce Croft. Available at: https://doi.org/10.25439/rmt.29624996.

ACM SIGIR ForumVol. 59(2)
MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.