Improving the Diagnostic Workup of Vertigo: A Multidisciplinary Review

This Clinical (Narrative) Review addresses potential improvements to the diagnostic workup of vertigo. Despite substantial healthcare expenditures, diagnostic accuracy for vertigo remains suboptimal, and many patients undergo extensive testing without timely identification of the underlying cause. The available literature, with a focus on articles published after 2015, was narratively reviewed for novel risk stratification metrics, clinical pathways, questionnaires, and technological tools that have been developed and studied for improving the diagnostic efficiency and accuracy of vertigo. Recent developments in the workup of vertigo are diverse and show potential for accurately stratifying patients by peripheral versus central etiology. As with any new clinical tools, there are barriers when it comes to implementing them into an emergency or primary care setting. AI/ML-based models are promising; however, further study is needed. These tools may support improved efficiency of the evaluation and management of patients who present with vertigo.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spartan Medical Research Journal
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51894/001c.158361
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the Diagnostic Workup of Vertigo: A Multidisciplinary Review

Vivek Shinde Patil, Jithin John, Abigail Entz, Andrew Ross et al.
Spartan Medical Research Journal
Vestibular and auditory disorders
article

Improving the Diagnostic Workup of Vertigo: A Multidisciplinary Review

Vivek Shinde Patil, Jithin John, Abigail Entz, Andrew Ross, Suhas B. Nagappala, Lauren Ghannam, Ananya Murali, Kristof Pusztai
article en

Abstract

This Clinical (Narrative) Review addresses potential improvements to the diagnostic workup of vertigo. Despite substantial healthcare expenditures, diagnostic accuracy for vertigo remains suboptimal, and many patients undergo extensive testing without timely identification of the underlying cause. The available literature, with a focus on articles published after 2015, was narratively reviewed for novel risk stratification metrics, clinical pathways, questionnaires, and technological tools that have been developed and studied for improving the diagnostic efficiency and accuracy of vertigo. Recent developments in the workup of vertigo are diverse and show potential for accurately stratifying patients by peripheral versus central etiology. As with any new clinical tools, there are barriers when it comes to implementing them into an emergency or primary care setting. AI/ML-based models are promising; however, further study is needed. These tools may support improved efficiency of the evaluation and management of patients who present with vertigo.

Spartan Medical Research JournalVol. 10(3)
University of Arizona (US), Wayne State University (US), Detroit Medical Center (US), Henry Ford Hospital (US), Columbia University (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.