Time to Pin Removal in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: The Pros and Cons

Abstract Background: Supracondylar humerus fractures (SHFs) are the most common elbow fractures in pediatric population; closed reduction with percutaneous pinning (CRPP) remains the gold standard of treating displaced fractures. Following surgery, removal of pins at 34 weeks is usually recommended. Prolonged pin fixation may result in higher risks of skin erosion, pin tract infection, and delayed recovery, while early pin removal may increase risks of loss of reduction or refracture due to inadequate union. Objectives: According to our knowledge, recent literature had not reported the outcomes comparing different timing of pin removal. The study aims to investigate the pros and cons of the timing of pin removal in pediatric SHFs treated with CRPP. Materials and Methods: This study was a single-center retrospective study of all cases of SHFs treated with CRPP from 2002 to 2022. According to the time of pin removal, patients were divided into three groups: Early pin removal (<3 weeks), intermediate (3–4 weeks), and late pin removal (more than 4 weeks). Primary outcomes include fracture union and elbow range of motion. Secondary outcomes include radiological assessments and complications. Results: A total of 122 patients were included in the final analysis, with 14 patients categorized in the early pin removal group, 49 patients in the intermediate group, and 59 in the late pin removal group. Patient demographic data show no difference in age, sex, fracture type, or follow-up period between groups. No cases of loss of reduction or refracture after pin removal were recorded. Moreover, there was no significant difference in functional or radiological outcomes. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of considering earlier pin removal in cases with bone callus formation observed on radiographs in SHFs according to the surgeon’s discretion. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are warranted to provide more definitive evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/fjmd.fjmd-d-25-00026
Primary Topic
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time to Pin Removal in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: The Pros and Cons

Pao-Cheng Kuo, Chi-Kuang Feng, Kuei-Hsiang Hsu, Yu-Ping Su
Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
article

Time to Pin Removal in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: The Pros and Cons

Pao-Cheng Kuo, Chi-Kuang Feng, Kuei-Hsiang Hsu, Yu-Ping Su
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Supracondylar humerus fractures (SHFs) are the most common elbow fractures in pediatric population; closed reduction with percutaneous pinning (CRPP) remains the gold standard of treating displaced fractures. Following surgery, removal of pins at 34 weeks is usually recommended. Prolonged pin fixation may result in higher risks of skin erosion, pin tract infection, and delayed recovery, while early pin removal may increase risks of loss of reduction or refracture due to inadequate union. Objectives: According to our knowledge, recent literature had not reported the outcomes comparing different timing of pin removal. The study aims to investigate the pros and cons of the timing of pin removal in pediatric SHFs treated with CRPP. Materials and Methods: This study was a single-center retrospective study of all cases of SHFs treated with CRPP from 2002 to 2022. According to the time of pin removal, patients were divided into three groups: Early pin removal (<3 weeks), intermediate (3–4 weeks), and late pin removal (more than 4 weeks). Primary outcomes include fracture union and elbow range of motion. Secondary outcomes include radiological assessments and complications. Results: A total of 122 patients were included in the final analysis, with 14 patients categorized in the early pin removal group, 49 patients in the intermediate group, and 59 in the late pin removal group. Patient demographic data show no difference in age, sex, fracture type, or follow-up period between groups. No cases of loss of reduction or refracture after pin removal were recorded. Moreover, there was no significant difference in functional or radiological outcomes. Conclusions: The findings support the feasibility of considering earlier pin removal in cases with bone callus formation observed on radiographs in SHFs according to the surgeon’s discretion. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts are warranted to provide more definitive evidence.

Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW), Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.