Ethical and culturally responsive biomarker research in the majority world

Abstract Studies of human development in the majority world rarely include biomarkers, especially outside research on nutrition and public health. Yet including the “bio” in bioecological has enormous potential to advance a global developmental science, reflective of the diversity found in most of the world's population. In this article, we discuss concerns related to the ethics and feasibility of conducting biomarker research in developmental studies in the majority world. We weigh these concerns against the potential benefits of advancing understanding of developmental mechanisms and processes, and how human development unfolds across cultures and contexts. In doing so, we draw on prior research and the authors' experiences developing and implementing studies that included biomarkers across multiple majority world contexts, and we suggest ways to explore various biomarker methods for their cultural and logistical feasibility. Combining rich data on the developmental ecosystem with biomarkers will enable scientific advancements relevant to the design of policies and interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development Perspectives
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cdpers/aadag003
Primary Topic
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical and culturally responsive biomarker research in the majority world

Elisa E. UGARTE, Alice J. Wuermli, Caroline Hiott, Ashraf Haque
Child Development Perspectives
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
article

Ethical and culturally responsive biomarker research in the majority world

Elisa E. UGARTE, Alice J. Wuermli, Caroline Hiott, Ashraf Haque
article en

Abstract

Abstract Studies of human development in the majority world rarely include biomarkers, especially outside research on nutrition and public health. Yet including the “bio” in bioecological has enormous potential to advance a global developmental science, reflective of the diversity found in most of the world's population. In this article, we discuss concerns related to the ethics and feasibility of conducting biomarker research in developmental studies in the majority world. We weigh these concerns against the potential benefits of advancing understanding of developmental mechanisms and processes, and how human development unfolds across cultures and contexts. In doing so, we draw on prior research and the authors' experiences developing and implementing studies that included biomarkers across multiple majority world contexts, and we suggest ways to explore various biomarker methods for their cultural and logistical feasibility. Combining rich data on the developmental ecosystem with biomarkers will enable scientific advancements relevant to the design of policies and interventions.

Child Development Perspectives
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (BD), Families USA (US), Syracuse University (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.