Next step after endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: metastatic risk assessment and management of non-curative resection cases

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an established treatment for early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the management of non-curative resections remains a clinical challenge. This review aimed to evaluate the next steps for patients with non-curative resections based on the existing literature. Relevant studies on ER outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, including recurrence rates, metastatic risks, and treatment strategies, were reviewed. The analysis focused on pathological findings, including tumor invasion depth and lymphovascular involvement (LVI). Comparative data on surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as adjuvant treatments were analyzed. Patients with pathological epithelial or lamina propria mucosa LVI-negative tumors showed low recurrence and metastasis rates (0.4%–5.6%). In contrast, those with submucosal or positive LVI cancer demonstrated a higher risk (10%–30%). Adjuvant treatment with surgery or CRT significantly reduced recurrence; however, the risk of complications must be considered. CRT showed favorable outcomes in low metastatic-risk cases, whereas surgery was preferred in high-risk patients. Active surveillance may be appropriate in certain low-risk patients with a poor overall health status. The management of non-curative ER cases requires individualized decision-making based on pathological risk factors. Further research is needed to refine the risk assessment and potentially utilize circulating tumor DNA testing to enhance precision.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Endoscopy
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2025.208
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Next step after endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: metastatic risk assessment and management of non-curative resection cases

Ryu Ishihara
Clinical Endoscopy
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Next step after endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: metastatic risk assessment and management of non-curative resection cases

Ryu Ishihara
article en

Abstract

Endoscopic resection (ER) is an established treatment for early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, the management of non-curative resections remains a clinical challenge. This review aimed to evaluate the next steps for patients with non-curative resections based on the existing literature. Relevant studies on ER outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, including recurrence rates, metastatic risks, and treatment strategies, were reviewed. The analysis focused on pathological findings, including tumor invasion depth and lymphovascular involvement (LVI). Comparative data on surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as adjuvant treatments were analyzed. Patients with pathological epithelial or lamina propria mucosa LVI-negative tumors showed low recurrence and metastasis rates (0.4%–5.6%). In contrast, those with submucosal or positive LVI cancer demonstrated a higher risk (10%–30%). Adjuvant treatment with surgery or CRT significantly reduced recurrence; however, the risk of complications must be considered. CRT showed favorable outcomes in low metastatic-risk cases, whereas surgery was preferred in high-risk patients. Active surveillance may be appropriate in certain low-risk patients with a poor overall health status. The management of non-curative ER cases requires individualized decision-making based on pathological risk factors. Further research is needed to refine the risk assessment and potentially utilize circulating tumor DNA testing to enhance precision.

Clinical EndoscopyVol. 59(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.