Simultaneous Discrete-Direct Methodology for Effective Treatment of Sparsely Sampled Sources of Aleatory Variability and Conservative Estimation of Tail Probabilities-Confirmation on a Weld Modeling Problem

Abstract Typically in engineering projects, aleatory variability of materials, phenomena, and geometry/hardware can only be sampled very sparsely by replicate physical experiments or tests. This precludes accurate identification of the form and parameters of frequency distributions for ensuing propagation through physics models. These very difficult conditions are well handled with a new class of discrete-sample propagation and uncertainty processing approaches described and demonstrated in this paper, instead of trying to infer the random function models from the sparse sample data and then propagate the inferred functions and inference uncertainties. We explain the “Simultaneous Discrete Direct” (SDD) approach for aleatory uncertainty representation and propagation of multiple sources of sparsely sampled aleatory variability and apply SDD to a realistic and challenging test problem involving computationally expensive weld and structural response models. We perform random draws of N=4 samples of each of five sources of known variability in the synthetic-reality test problem, propagate all samples with N=4 model runs per the economical SDD approach, and use specialized 1-D uncertainty quantification techniques to statistically process the N=4 samples of each of 40 response quantities of the structural model into reliably conservative bounding estimates on 0.005 tail quantiles and probabilities. We perform 250 random trials to quantify the usefully high reliability/confidence of attaining conservative estimates. SDD is also simpler and less computationally expensive than frequency-distribution inference and propagation methods so in general appears well suited for sparse-data conditions typical in engineering applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical Engineering
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071289
Primary Topic
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simultaneous Discrete-Direct Methodology for Effective Treatment of Sparsely Sampled Sources of Aleatory Variability and Conservative Estimation of Tail Probabilities-Confirmation on a Weld Modeling Problem

Kyle Karlson, Vicente J. Romero, Guy Bergel
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical Engineering
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
article

Simultaneous Discrete-Direct Methodology for Effective Treatment of Sparsely Sampled Sources of Aleatory Variability and Conservative Estimation of Tail Probabilities-Confirmation on a Weld Modeling Problem

Kyle Karlson, Vicente J. Romero, Guy Bergel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Typically in engineering projects, aleatory variability of materials, phenomena, and geometry/hardware can only be sampled very sparsely by replicate physical experiments or tests. This precludes accurate identification of the form and parameters of frequency distributions for ensuing propagation through physics models. These very difficult conditions are well handled with a new class of discrete-sample propagation and uncertainty processing approaches described and demonstrated in this paper, instead of trying to infer the random function models from the sparse sample data and then propagate the inferred functions and inference uncertainties. We explain the “Simultaneous Discrete Direct” (SDD) approach for aleatory uncertainty representation and propagation of multiple sources of sparsely sampled aleatory variability and apply SDD to a realistic and challenging test problem involving computationally expensive weld and structural response models. We perform random draws of N=4 samples of each of five sources of known variability in the synthetic-reality test problem, propagate all samples with N=4 model runs per the economical SDD approach, and use specialized 1-D uncertainty quantification techniques to statistically process the N=4 samples of each of 40 response quantities of the structural model into reliably conservative bounding estimates on 0.005 tail quantiles and probabilities. We perform 250 random trials to quantify the usefully high reliability/confidence of attaining conservative estimates. SDD is also simpler and less computationally expensive than frequency-distribution inference and propagation methods so in general appears well suited for sparse-data conditions typical in engineering applications.

ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical Engineering
Sandia National Laboratories (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.