Psychology’s evolution: Two decades of the world anti-doping code and global doping prevention

In an attempt to address the critical issue of doping in sport, the first World Anti-Doping Code (WADC) was introduced in 2003. Over the following 20 years, researchers conducted both quantitative and qualitative research to aid our understanding of the psychological and social factors that influence doping. To date, there has been no comprehensive review of this body of research. To address this gap, a narrative review was conducted to explore publication, methodological, and theoretical trends in quantitative and qualitative doping research over the relevant period. The review identifies an increase in both quantitative and qualitative research over the 20 years, with a dominance of quantitative research, predominantly adopting cross-sectional designs. Conceptually, two theories were most dominant in quantitative research, whereas qualitative research exhibited greater theoretical diversity and a higher percentage of atheoretical studies. The findings highlight the need for more robust and ecologically valid research applicable to real-world anti-doping and clean sport education. The review also highlights the potential of mixed methods research to leverage the strengths of both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Building on these insights, the goal is for future research to make considerable progress in understanding and addressing doping in sport over the second 20 years of the WADC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sport & Exercise Psychology Review
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpssepr.2025.20.1.38
Primary Topic
Doping in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychology’s evolution: Two decades of the world anti-doping code and global doping prevention

Ian Boardley
Sport & Exercise Psychology Review
Doping in Sports
article

Psychology’s evolution: Two decades of the world anti-doping code and global doping prevention

Ian Boardley
article en

Abstract

In an attempt to address the critical issue of doping in sport, the first World Anti-Doping Code (WADC) was introduced in 2003. Over the following 20 years, researchers conducted both quantitative and qualitative research to aid our understanding of the psychological and social factors that influence doping. To date, there has been no comprehensive review of this body of research. To address this gap, a narrative review was conducted to explore publication, methodological, and theoretical trends in quantitative and qualitative doping research over the relevant period. The review identifies an increase in both quantitative and qualitative research over the 20 years, with a dominance of quantitative research, predominantly adopting cross-sectional designs. Conceptually, two theories were most dominant in quantitative research, whereas qualitative research exhibited greater theoretical diversity and a higher percentage of atheoretical studies. The findings highlight the need for more robust and ecologically valid research applicable to real-world anti-doping and clean sport education. The review also highlights the potential of mixed methods research to leverage the strengths of both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Building on these insights, the goal is for future research to make considerable progress in understanding and addressing doping in sport over the second 20 years of the WADC.

Sport & Exercise Psychology ReviewVol. 20(1)
Center for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Doping in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.