Analysis of Vascular Access Complications in Intensive Care Unit Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Compared to Non-COVID-19 ARDS: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Background: Patients diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) who require Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission often require invasive vascular access including central venous catheters and arterial lines. Early reports of excessive thrombosis combined with the severity of illness in COVID-19 could lead to more line-related thrombosis and infections, requiring more line replacements. This retrospective cohort study explores differences in vascular access usage and line-related complications between patients with COVID-19 ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS. Methods: A cohort of patients with COVID-19 ARDS (n = 81) was compared to a cohort of patients with non-COVID-19 ARDS (n = 46). We compared baseline characteristics, total number and placement rate of lines (arterial lines, central venous catheters, and dialysis catheters), and incidence of line-related complications (bleeding, thrombosis, or infection). Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Excel software, with associations assessed using Chi-squared, Fisher’s exact, and t-tests. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The COVID-19 cohort had significantly greater total number of lines per patient (4.00 vs. 2.76, p < 0.001). This was due to more arterial (2.17 vs. 1.41, p = 0.003) and dialysis lines (0.43 vs. 0.13, p = 0.002) per patient. There was no significant difference in the number of central venous catheters. When adjusted for length of stay in the ICU, the rate of line placement was not significantly different between groups. The COVID-19 cohort had a significantly greater number of line-related complications defined as thrombosis, bleeding, and infections (18 vs. 2, p = 0.008). Conclusions: The significantly greater total number of lines in the COVID-19 group was likely attributable to COVID-19 patients’ longer lengths of stay in the ICU. Patients with COVID-19 appear to have significantly more line-related complications, which may be due to the greater total number of lines, the longer lengths of stay, and inherent demographic and comorbid differences. Future studies are needed to assess methods for prevention of line-related complications in patients with COVID-19 ARDS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
COVID
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/covid6030042
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Vascular Access Complications in Intensive Care Unit Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Compared to Non-COVID-19 ARDS: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Rami Bzeih, A. Aziz, MacKenzie Mayo, Twylla Tassava
COVID
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Analysis of Vascular Access Complications in Intensive Care Unit Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Compared to Non-COVID-19 ARDS: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Rami Bzeih, A. Aziz, MacKenzie Mayo, Twylla Tassava
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) who require Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission often require invasive vascular access including central venous catheters and arterial lines. Early reports of excessive thrombosis combined with the severity of illness in COVID-19 could lead to more line-related thrombosis and infections, requiring more line replacements. This retrospective cohort study explores differences in vascular access usage and line-related complications between patients with COVID-19 ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS. Methods: A cohort of patients with COVID-19 ARDS (n = 81) was compared to a cohort of patients with non-COVID-19 ARDS (n = 46). We compared baseline characteristics, total number and placement rate of lines (arterial lines, central venous catheters, and dialysis catheters), and incidence of line-related complications (bleeding, thrombosis, or infection). Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Excel software, with associations assessed using Chi-squared, Fisher’s exact, and t-tests. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The COVID-19 cohort had significantly greater total number of lines per patient (4.00 vs. 2.76, p < 0.001). This was due to more arterial (2.17 vs. 1.41, p = 0.003) and dialysis lines (0.43 vs. 0.13, p = 0.002) per patient. There was no significant difference in the number of central venous catheters. When adjusted for length of stay in the ICU, the rate of line placement was not significantly different between groups. The COVID-19 cohort had a significantly greater number of line-related complications defined as thrombosis, bleeding, and infections (18 vs. 2, p = 0.008). Conclusions: The significantly greater total number of lines in the COVID-19 group was likely attributable to COVID-19 patients’ longer lengths of stay in the ICU. Patients with COVID-19 appear to have significantly more line-related complications, which may be due to the greater total number of lines, the longer lengths of stay, and inherent demographic and comorbid differences. Future studies are needed to assess methods for prevention of line-related complications in patients with COVID-19 ARDS.

COVIDVol. 6(3)
Northwell Health (US), Trinity Health (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.