False Reality Bias in Treasury Management

This study examines the False Reality Bias in treasury management, a cognitive distortion through which small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) infer financial stability from salient bank balances while overlooking pending obligations and cash-flow timing. Using a firm-level dataset of 50 Spanish meat-processing SMEs, the analysis develops two behavioral-finance indicators: the Liquidity Misperception Index (PEL), capturing the divergence between salient liquidity cues and effective short-term obligations, and the Liquidity Misconfidence Index (ICEL), measuring managerial overconfidence in liquidity assessments. Results show that 41% of firms overestimate liquidity (average PEL = 1.21), while 40% exhibit excessive confidence (ICEL > 1.3), both significantly associated with liquidity distress. Econometric estimates indicate that firms with PEL values above 1.2 are 4.48 times more likely to experience liquidity crises, even after controlling for bank balance levels. Predictive models are used in an exploratory capacity, achieving classification accuracies above 80% and supporting the robustness of the behavioral signals identified. In addition, AI-assisted cash-flow simulations reduce liquidity misperception by 34.7% (p < 0.01). Overall, the findings provide micro-level evidence that cognitive biases systematically distort SME treasury decisions but can be partially corrected through targeted decision-support tools, offering practical insights for managers, advisors, and policymakers.