Radar-based inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio estimation: a validation study

Respiration is a key indicator of health and wellbeing, with metrics such as respiratory rate (RR), inspiratory time (TI), expiratory time (TE), and the inspiratory-to-expiratory time (I:E) ratio offering insights into conditions ranging from acute life-threatening and chronic diseases to symptom management. While traditional methods already measure these parameters with high accuracy, they still require contact-based sensors, limiting their practicality for continuous monitoring. This study evaluates radar as a non-contact alternative by validating multiple radar-derived respiratory metrics against impedance pneumography measurements in 30 healthy volunteers at rest. Synchronous recordings from both modalities were analysed to assess agreement across methods using descriptive statistics, scatter plots, modified Bland-Altman plots, and equivalence testing (TI: ±0.3 s, TE: ±0.3 s, RR: ±2 brpm, I:E ratio: ±0.2). Equivalence testing indicated high correlation (p ≤ 0.001***) across all metrics, with 81.8% (TI), 77.6% (TE), 97.2% (RR), and 85.7% (I:E ratio) of values within predefined bounds. These findings highlight radar's potential for continuous respiratory monitoring, particularly in medical fields where minimizing patient burden is essential as in palliative, post anaesthesia, and intensive care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42517-9
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radar-based inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio estimation: a validation study

Bjoern M. Eskofier, Christoph Ostgathe, Stefan G. Grießhammer, Anke Malessa et al.
Scientific Reports
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

Radar-based inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio estimation: a validation study

Bjoern M. Eskofier, Christoph Ostgathe, Stefan G. Grießhammer, Anke Malessa, Kilin Shi, Tobias Steigleder, Marie Oesten, Thanh Truc Tran, Maria Heckel, Alexander Koelpin
article en

Abstract

Respiration is a key indicator of health and wellbeing, with metrics such as respiratory rate (RR), inspiratory time (TI), expiratory time (TE), and the inspiratory-to-expiratory time (I:E) ratio offering insights into conditions ranging from acute life-threatening and chronic diseases to symptom management. While traditional methods already measure these parameters with high accuracy, they still require contact-based sensors, limiting their practicality for continuous monitoring. This study evaluates radar as a non-contact alternative by validating multiple radar-derived respiratory metrics against impedance pneumography measurements in 30 healthy volunteers at rest. Synchronous recordings from both modalities were analysed to assess agreement across methods using descriptive statistics, scatter plots, modified Bland-Altman plots, and equivalence testing (TI: ±0.3 s, TE: ±0.3 s, RR: ±2 brpm, I:E ratio: ±0.2). Equivalence testing indicated high correlation (p ≤ 0.001***) across all metrics, with 81.8% (TI), 77.6% (TE), 97.2% (RR), and 85.7% (I:E ratio) of values within predefined bounds. These findings highlight radar's potential for continuous respiratory monitoring, particularly in medical fields where minimizing patient burden is essential as in palliative, post anaesthesia, and intensive care settings.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands) (NL), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Helmholtz Zentrum München (DE), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen (DE), Munich Center for Machine Learning, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.