Modeling the impacts of climate-smart practices on soil–water interaction and wheat yield under climate change in central Ethiopia

This study aimed to model the impact of climate-smart agricultural (CSA) practices on soil‒water balance, water use efficiency (WUE<sub>ET</sub>), and wheat yield in the face of climate change. The AquaCrop version 7.1 model was used to estimate the water balance and yield under the baseline (1981-2010) and future (2050s, RCP4.5) climate scenarios. We evaluated five CSA practices, varying in tillage, residue management, and water management, based on experiments conducted in 2020 and 2021. Observed data on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield and surface runoff were used for model calibration (2020) and evaluation (2021). The model was evaluated using four performance indicators and found to be robust. The treatments included farmers' conventional practices (CPs), soil bunds (SBs), crop residues (CRs), integrated conservation practices (ICPs), and berken plows (BPs). The results show that climate change is likely to reduce grain yield and WUE<sub>ET</sub> under CP by 1% and 16.3%, respectively, by 2050 compared to the current 2021 period. All CSA practices studied increased grain yield and WUE<sub>ET</sub> over the CP in both periods. Under future climates, ICP showed a greater relative grain yield (Y = 4.51 t/ha), water use efficiency (WUE<sub>ET</sub> = 1.32 kg m<sup>3</sup>), and other soil water balances, followed by CR, BP, and SB over CP. Overall, ICP has shown tremendous potential for climate change adaptation among the other CSA practices tested. Therefore, adaptation to future climate conditions must integrate different practices, and the novel ICP can be promoted as a climate-smart practice in similar farming systems and agro-ecological settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39954-x
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the impacts of climate-smart practices on soil–water interaction and wheat yield under climate change in central Ethiopia

Sintayehu Fetene Demessie, Abera Assefa Biratu, Bobe Bedadi, Fitih Ademe et al.
Scientific Reports
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

Modeling the impacts of climate-smart practices on soil–water interaction and wheat yield under climate change in central Ethiopia

Sintayehu Fetene Demessie, Abera Assefa Biratu, Bobe Bedadi, Fitih Ademe, Assefa Mekonnen Melesse, Wuletawu Abera, Desale Kidane Asmamaw, Solomon Gebreyohannis Gebrehiwot, Lulseged Tamene, Tilahun Hordofa, Zenebe Adimassu
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to model the impact of climate-smart agricultural (CSA) practices on soil‒water balance, water use efficiency (WUE<sub>ET</sub>), and wheat yield in the face of climate change. The AquaCrop version 7.1 model was used to estimate the water balance and yield under the baseline (1981-2010) and future (2050s, RCP4.5) climate scenarios. We evaluated five CSA practices, varying in tillage, residue management, and water management, based on experiments conducted in 2020 and 2021. Observed data on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield and surface runoff were used for model calibration (2020) and evaluation (2021). The model was evaluated using four performance indicators and found to be robust. The treatments included farmers' conventional practices (CPs), soil bunds (SBs), crop residues (CRs), integrated conservation practices (ICPs), and berken plows (BPs). The results show that climate change is likely to reduce grain yield and WUE<sub>ET</sub> under CP by 1% and 16.3%, respectively, by 2050 compared to the current 2021 period. All CSA practices studied increased grain yield and WUE<sub>ET</sub> over the CP in both periods. Under future climates, ICP showed a greater relative grain yield (Y = 4.51 t/ha), water use efficiency (WUE<sub>ET</sub> = 1.32 kg m<sup>3</sup>), and other soil water balances, followed by CR, BP, and SB over CP. Overall, ICP has shown tremendous potential for climate change adaptation among the other CSA practices tested. Therefore, adaptation to future climate conditions must integrate different practices, and the novel ICP can be promoted as a climate-smart practice in similar farming systems and agro-ecological settings.

Scientific Reports
Haramaya University (ET), Florida International University (US), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Ghent University (BE), Bioversity International (CO), Kotebe University of Education (ET), Water and Land Resource Centre (ET), Addis Ababa University (ET), Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (ET), Bahir Dar University (ET)
UK Research and Innovation, New Zealand Government, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Haramaya University, Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.