Curved background and foreground elements enhance the appeal of indoor spaces

Architects have long assumed that curvature enhances positive emotional and aesthetic experiences of architectural spaces. While empirical evidence for this claim exists, conflicting results have also been reported, possibly because curvature information is experienced differently in different architectural contexts. Here, we sought to control the conditions under which architectural curvature is experienced by asking an architect to design interior spaces that varied systematically in the use of curvilinear and angular forms. Specifically, we constructed versions of the same interior space such that curvilinear and angular forms were either present in the foreground or in the background, and asked participants ( N = 30) to rate them on different experiential dimensions, including liking, beauty, coherence, fascination, hominess, emotional responses, as well as their willingness to spend time in the space. Results revealed a strong main effect of curvature. Curvilinear spaces were rated as more aesthetically pleasing and emotionally positive than angular spaces. Curvature also positively influenced ratings of coherence, fascination, hominess, and willingness to spend time. Strikingly, these effects were more pronounced when the curvilinear elements were placed in the foreground of the architectural space than when placed in the background. Together, these results not only lend further support to the thesis that curvature exerts a positive influence on the hedonic and aesthetic experience of architectural spaces, but also show that the effect of curvature is modulated by its placement in the architectural space. This finding has practical implications for architects interested in the question of how architectural design might enhance human well-being. • Curvature enhances aesthetic, emotional, and experiential evaluations of architectural interiors. • Foreground curvature produces stronger effects than background curvature. • Curvature enhances coherence, fascination, hominess, and willingness to spend time. • Architect-designed stimuli enable controlled testing of curvature in architecture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.102974
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curved background and foreground elements enhance the appeal of indoor spaces

Claudia Damiano, Na Wei, Erick G. Chuquichambi, Vasiliki Meletaki et al.
1 citations
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Architecture and Computational Design
25.49
article

Curved background and foreground elements enhance the appeal of indoor spaces

Claudia Damiano, Na Wei, Erick G. Chuquichambi, Vasiliki Meletaki, Dirk Walther, Keaton Bruce, Anjan Chatterjee, Martin Skov
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Architects have long assumed that curvature enhances positive emotional and aesthetic experiences of architectural spaces. While empirical evidence for this claim exists, conflicting results have also been reported, possibly because curvature information is experienced differently in different architectural contexts. Here, we sought to control the conditions under which architectural curvature is experienced by asking an architect to design interior spaces that varied systematically in the use of curvilinear and angular forms. Specifically, we constructed versions of the same interior space such that curvilinear and angular forms were either present in the foreground or in the background, and asked participants ( N = 30) to rate them on different experiential dimensions, including liking, beauty, coherence, fascination, hominess, emotional responses, as well as their willingness to spend time in the space. Results revealed a strong main effect of curvature. Curvilinear spaces were rated as more aesthetically pleasing and emotionally positive than angular spaces. Curvature also positively influenced ratings of coherence, fascination, hominess, and willingness to spend time. Strikingly, these effects were more pronounced when the curvilinear elements were placed in the foreground of the architectural space than when placed in the background. Together, these results not only lend further support to the thesis that curvature exerts a positive influence on the hedonic and aesthetic experience of architectural spaces, but also show that the effect of curvature is modulated by its placement in the architectural space. This finding has practical implications for architects interested in the question of how architectural design might enhance human well-being. • Curvature enhances aesthetic, emotional, and experiential evaluations of architectural interiors. • Foreground curvature produces stronger effects than background curvature. • Curvature enhances coherence, fascination, hominess, and willingness to spend time. • Architect-designed stimuli enable controlled testing of curvature in architecture.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 111
University of Toronto (CA), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Universitat de les Illes Balears (ES), University of Pennsylvania (US), Temple University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Architecture and Computational Design
25.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.