Research on multiple improvement paths of innovation performance in regional innovation ecosystem based on fuzzy qualitative comparative analysis

Prioritizing the development of regional innovation ecosystems (RIE) is essential for advancing China’s innovation-driven strategy. This study investigates how combinations of innovation elements, namely resources, services, achievements, and environment, affect regional innovation performance. Drawing on both innovation value-chain and ecosystem perspectives, we analyze the data from 31 Chinese provinces using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Our findings identify five distinct configurations that lead to high innovation performance and three that result in low or medium performance. High performance configurations include: resource achievement dual drive, outcome driven, and resource driven. Low performance configurations include talent shortage type, service deficiency type, and resource service dual weakness type. These results illustrate the principle of equifinality, indicating that different regions can achieve similar innovation outcomes through different pathways, and they underscore both the substitutability of certain elements and the synergy among them. Theoretically, the study advances configurational approaches in innovation research by integrating ecological and value-chain perspectives. Practically, it provides differentiated policy insights, suggesting that regions should tailor their innovation strategies to leverage specific strengths and thereby foster high-performance outcomes. First published online 4 March 2026

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technological and Economic Development of Economy
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2026.25190
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on multiple improvement paths of innovation performance in regional innovation ecosystem based on fuzzy qualitative comparative analysis

Yue Long, Qihao Chen, Mei Wang
Technological and Economic Development of Economy
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Research on multiple improvement paths of innovation performance in regional innovation ecosystem based on fuzzy qualitative comparative analysis

Yue Long, Qihao Chen, Mei Wang
article en

Abstract

Prioritizing the development of regional innovation ecosystems (RIE) is essential for advancing China’s innovation-driven strategy. This study investigates how combinations of innovation elements, namely resources, services, achievements, and environment, affect regional innovation performance. Drawing on both innovation value-chain and ecosystem perspectives, we analyze the data from 31 Chinese provinces using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Our findings identify five distinct configurations that lead to high innovation performance and three that result in low or medium performance. High performance configurations include: resource achievement dual drive, outcome driven, and resource driven. Low performance configurations include talent shortage type, service deficiency type, and resource service dual weakness type. These results illustrate the principle of equifinality, indicating that different regions can achieve similar innovation outcomes through different pathways, and they underscore both the substitutability of certain elements and the synergy among them. Theoretically, the study advances configurational approaches in innovation research by integrating ecological and value-chain perspectives. Practically, it provides differentiated policy insights, suggesting that regions should tailor their innovation strategies to leverage specific strengths and thereby foster high-performance outcomes. First published online 4 March 2026

Technological and Economic Development of EconomyVol. 0(0)
Chongqing Technology and Business University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.