On the Computational Reproducibility of Human-Computer Interaction

An increasing number of HCI researchers have embraced open science ideas, such as sharing data and analysis code. However, such practices are only meaningful when the shared data and code enable other researchers to reproduce and reuse the reported findings. To investigate the reproducibility of HCI research, we identified all CHI papers that have shared study data and analysis code, and attempted to reproduce the results. We were able to fully reproduce 49% of the papers. We surveyed and interviewed authors, asking them to assess the reproducibility of their own work and to reflect on their motivations and obstacles in doing open science. We discuss what improves and hinders reproducibility and provide recommendations on how to increase reproducibility rates in HCI. While the value of replicability remains contested in HCI, we argue that the more modest goal of reproducibility is desirable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791129
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Usability and User Interface Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Computational Reproducibility of Human-Computer Interaction

Olga Iarygina, Aske Mottelson, Kasper Anders Søren Hornbæk, Aske ; id_orcid 0000-0003-1827-8513 Mottelson
1 citations
Usability and User Interface Design
article

On the Computational Reproducibility of Human-Computer Interaction

Olga Iarygina, Aske Mottelson, Kasper Anders Søren Hornbæk, Aske ; id_orcid 0000-0003-1827-8513 Mottelson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

An increasing number of HCI researchers have embraced open science ideas, such as sharing data and analysis code. However, such practices are only meaningful when the shared data and code enable other researchers to reproduce and reuse the reported findings. To investigate the reproducibility of HCI research, we identified all CHI papers that have shared study data and analysis code, and attempted to reproduce the results. We were able to fully reproduce 49% of the papers. We surveyed and interviewed authors, asking them to assess the reproducibility of their own work and to reflect on their motivations and obstacles in doing open science. We discuss what improves and hinders reproducibility and provide recommendations on how to increase reproducibility rates in HCI. While the value of replicability remains contested in HCI, we argue that the more modest goal of reproducibility is desirable.

University of Copenhagen (DK), University College Copenhagen (DK), IT University of Copenhagen (DK)
Villum Fonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Usability and User Interface Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.