Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Bone Health: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Emerging Perspectives on Bone Fragility

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their effects on the skeletal system, independent of the influence of bone metastases, are not fully understood. This critical review specifically summarizes the current evidence on the systemic skeletal effects of ICIs in patients without bone metastases, focusing on changes in bone turnover markers (BTMs), bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk, thereby addressing a significant gap in the literature. It also explores potential mechanisms, such as immune-mediated disruption of bone remodeling and alterations in bone quality. Preclinical in vivo models consistently report that blocking the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) pathways leads to bone loss and increased osteoclast activity. However, clinical findings are paradoxical; while one study using opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (QCT) reported preserved or even improved BMD in patients on ICI therapy, large cohort studies and pharmacovigilance analyses have revealed a consistently elevated risk of fragility fractures. Current assessment tools have limitations in capturing the true skeletal burden of ICI therapy. A significant discrepancy exists between preclinical data suggesting bone loss and clinical data showing both stable BMD and increased fracture risk. Addressing these knowledge gaps through prospective, high-resolution studies is critical for improving survivorship care. A clearer understanding is essential for developing strategies to prevent skeletal complications in the growing population of patients receiving immunotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Osteoporosis Reports
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-026-00952-7
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Bone Health: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Emerging Perspectives on Bone Fragility

İSMAİL BEYPINAR, Mustafa Unal, Muhammed Emin Bedir, Abdulhadi Cihangir Uguz
Current Osteoporosis Reports
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Bone Health: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Emerging Perspectives on Bone Fragility

İSMAİL BEYPINAR, Mustafa Unal, Muhammed Emin Bedir, Abdulhadi Cihangir Uguz
article en

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their effects on the skeletal system, independent of the influence of bone metastases, are not fully understood. This critical review specifically summarizes the current evidence on the systemic skeletal effects of ICIs in patients without bone metastases, focusing on changes in bone turnover markers (BTMs), bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk, thereby addressing a significant gap in the literature. It also explores potential mechanisms, such as immune-mediated disruption of bone remodeling and alterations in bone quality. Preclinical in vivo models consistently report that blocking the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) pathways leads to bone loss and increased osteoclast activity. However, clinical findings are paradoxical; while one study using opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (QCT) reported preserved or even improved BMD in patients on ICI therapy, large cohort studies and pharmacovigilance analyses have revealed a consistently elevated risk of fragility fractures. Current assessment tools have limitations in capturing the true skeletal burden of ICI therapy. A significant discrepancy exists between preclinical data suggesting bone loss and clinical data showing both stable BMD and increased fracture risk. Addressing these knowledge gaps through prospective, high-resolution studies is critical for improving survivorship care. A clearer understanding is essential for developing strategies to prevent skeletal complications in the growing population of patients receiving immunotherapy.

Current Osteoporosis ReportsVol. 24(1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Harvard University (US), Alanya University (TR), Turkish Aerospace Industries (Turkey) (TR), Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.