Technical Standards for Latin and Ancient Greek: Referencing, Evaluation, Documentation

This pitch argues that rapid advances in AI and NLP for Latin and Ancient Greek have outpaced the development and adoption of shared technical standards. While the field already has relevant frameworks—such as CITE URNs, Canonical Text Services, model cards, datasheets, and platforms like Hugging Face—their implementation is uneven and insufficient for sustainable research. The core question is how to make NLP research for ancient languages more sustainable. Proposed steps include: comprehensive surveys of methods and performance, identifying weaknesses in existing standards or their adoption, developing clear guidelines and best practices, fostering collaboration through workshops, benchmarking, and shared code. Concrete “first issues” include standardizing lemmatization via canonical lemma lists, creating domain-specific annotation guidelines for named entity recognition, and agreeing on canonical encoding and normalization practices. Overall, the presentation calls for coordinated community efforts to align innovation in digital classics with robust referencing, documentation, and evaluation standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18863969
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical Standards for Latin and Ancient Greek: Referencing, Evaluation, Documentation

Konstantin Schulz
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Technical Standards for Latin and Ancient Greek: Referencing, Evaluation, Documentation

Konstantin Schulz
article en

Abstract

This pitch argues that rapid advances in AI and NLP for Latin and Ancient Greek have outpaced the development and adoption of shared technical standards. While the field already has relevant frameworks—such as CITE URNs, Canonical Text Services, model cards, datasheets, and platforms like Hugging Face—their implementation is uneven and insufficient for sustainable research. The core question is how to make NLP research for ancient languages more sustainable. Proposed steps include: comprehensive surveys of methods and performance, identifying weaknesses in existing standards or their adoption, developing clear guidelines and best practices, fostering collaboration through workshops, benchmarking, and shared code. Concrete “first issues” include standardizing lemmatization via canonical lemma lists, creating domain-specific annotation guidelines for named entity recognition, and agreeing on canonical encoding and normalization practices. Overall, the presentation calls for coordinated community efforts to align innovation in digital classics with robust referencing, documentation, and evaluation standards.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Technical Standards for Latin and Ancient Greek: Referencing, Evaluation, Documentation — Konstantin Schulz · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS