From hazard detection to risk analytics in southern Africa: Twenty-five years of drought and flood research (2000–2024)

Southern Africa is a global hotspot for hydrometeorological risk, with intensifying droughts and floods increasingly disrupting livelihoods, ecosystems, and infrastructure. This study presents a systematic bibliometric and scientometric synthesis of 1481 peer-reviewed publications on drought and flood hazards published between 2000 and 2024 across the Southern African Development Community. Using a PRISMA-guided workflow, co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence analyses are combined with topic–method mapping and sensitivity testing to examine the structure and evolution of the regional research landscape. Annual publication output increased nearly tenfold, from fewer than 15 studies per year in the early 2000s to over 140 after 2020 , with distinct surges following the 2015–2016 El Niño drought and Cyclones Idai and Kenneth (2019). Co-word analysis identifies four interconnected research clusters spanning drought diagnostics, flood and catchment-scale hydrology, agriculture and food-security impacts, and risk and adaptation, reflecting a gradual shift toward decision-oriented risk analytics. Despite this progression, explicit compound-hazard analysis, treatment of non-stationarity, and integration of socio-economic and governance dimensions remain limited. Strong geographic asymmetries persist, with South African institutions dominating outputs and several hazard-exposed member states underrepresented. These findings highlight both advances and structural gaps with implications for anticipatory adaptation and regional risk governance. • Quantifies a tenfold increase in Southern African drought and flood research following major climate extremes. • Demonstrates a systematic shift from index-based hazard detection to decision-oriented risk analytics. • Reveals four dominant research clusters and their weak integration around compound and cascading hazards. • Shows that socio-economic and governance concepts are often invoked but rarely operationalised analytically. • Exposes persistent regional and institutional asymmetries shaping the Southern African risk knowledge base.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Disaster Science
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100543
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From hazard detection to risk analytics in southern Africa: Twenty-five years of drought and flood research (2000–2024)

Marcio Fernando Mathe
Progress in Disaster Science
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
article

From hazard detection to risk analytics in southern Africa: Twenty-five years of drought and flood research (2000–2024)

Marcio Fernando Mathe
article en

Abstract

Southern Africa is a global hotspot for hydrometeorological risk, with intensifying droughts and floods increasingly disrupting livelihoods, ecosystems, and infrastructure. This study presents a systematic bibliometric and scientometric synthesis of 1481 peer-reviewed publications on drought and flood hazards published between 2000 and 2024 across the Southern African Development Community. Using a PRISMA-guided workflow, co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword co-occurrence analyses are combined with topic–method mapping and sensitivity testing to examine the structure and evolution of the regional research landscape. Annual publication output increased nearly tenfold, from fewer than 15 studies per year in the early 2000s to over 140 after 2020 , with distinct surges following the 2015–2016 El Niño drought and Cyclones Idai and Kenneth (2019). Co-word analysis identifies four interconnected research clusters spanning drought diagnostics, flood and catchment-scale hydrology, agriculture and food-security impacts, and risk and adaptation, reflecting a gradual shift toward decision-oriented risk analytics. Despite this progression, explicit compound-hazard analysis, treatment of non-stationarity, and integration of socio-economic and governance dimensions remain limited. Strong geographic asymmetries persist, with South African institutions dominating outputs and several hazard-exposed member states underrepresented. These findings highlight both advances and structural gaps with implications for anticipatory adaptation and regional risk governance. • Quantifies a tenfold increase in Southern African drought and flood research following major climate extremes. • Demonstrates a systematic shift from index-based hazard detection to decision-oriented risk analytics. • Reveals four dominant research clusters and their weak integration around compound and cascading hazards. • Shows that socio-economic and governance concepts are often invoked but rarely operationalised analytically. • Exposes persistent regional and institutional asymmetries shaping the Southern African risk knowledge base.

Progress in Disaster ScienceVol. 30
Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ), Lund University (SE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.